Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2016
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2016
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Sequences, Taxonomic Assignments, And R Script From Comparison Of Lava Cave Bacterial Mat Communities To Overlying Surface Soil Bacterial Communities From Lava Beds National Monument, Usa

Authors: Lavoie, Kathleen;

Sequences, Taxonomic Assignments, And R Script From Comparison Of Lava Cave Bacterial Mat Communities To Overlying Surface Soil Bacterial Communities From Lava Beds National Monument, Usa

Abstract

This set of files contain the 16S rDNA, taxonomic assignments from the greengenes database, and the R script for processing the data. Abstract Lava caves around the world often support extensive microbial mats on ceilings and walls in a range of colors. Little is known about lava cave microbial diversity and how these subsurface mats differ from microbial communities in overlying surface soils. We generated and analyzed bacterial 16S rDNA from 454 pyrosequencing from three colors of microbial mats (tan, white, and yellow) from seven lava caves in Lava Beds National Monument, CA, USA, and compared them with surface soils overlying each cave. Actinobacteria dominated in all samples, with 39% (caves) and 21% (surface soils). Proteobacteria made up 30% of phyla from caves and 36% from surface soil with Gamma- 20% and Alpha- 10% in the caves and Gamma- 18% with Alpha-17% in soil. Other major phyla in caves were Nitrospirae (7%) followed by Minor Phyla (7%), compared to surface soils with Bacteriodetes (8%) and Minor phyla (8%). A very high proportion (53.33%) of the most abundant sequences could not be identified to genus, indicating a high degree of novelty. Surface soil samples had more OTUs and greater diversity indices than cave samples. The same phyla were represented in both soils and cave microbial mats, but the overlap was only 11.2% at the operational taxonomic unit (OTU). Although surface soil microbes immigrate into underlying caves, the environment selects for microbes able to live in the cave habitats, resulting in very different cave microbial communities. In terms of species richness, diversity by mat color differed, but not significantly. Number of entrances per cave, distance from an entrance, cave length, and temperature also contributed to observed differences in diversity. With high levels of novel microbes, caves may represent excellent habitats for the isolation of new bioactive compounds. This study is the first comprehensive comparisons of bacterial communities in lava caves with the overlying soil community.

Keywords

16S rDNA, Lavabeds National Monument, microbial mats, lava tube caves

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 13
    download downloads 2
  • 13
    views
    2
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
13
2