Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This document presents the results of the second evaluation and validation iteration of the CAPABLE prototypes as defined in previous deliverable D7.1. In this validation process, an updated version of the WP6 prototype has been evaluated applying the two methods presented in D7.1: Interviews with patients and relatives. These interviews aimed to collect feedback from the end-users of the Patient App: melanoma and kidney cancer patients during the treatment phase. Given the broader applicability of the app to any type of cancer patient, this iteration included also other types of oncological patients, cancer survivors (treatment finished since no more than 2 years), and experts in patients’ needs, such as caregivers. Overall, 17 patients and 2 caregivers have been interviewed. Interviews with healthcare professionals (HCPs). These interviews aimed to collect overall feedback about both doctors’ and patients’ solutions, understand if the clinical and patients’ needs are covered, and revise the core functionalities that have been proposed in the current prototype. A total of 11 health professionals have been interviewed. We present the results of the 2 executed studies. The protocols of each study are attached in the annex. The document also presents the general conclusions from these validation activities and the next steps to follow in the future developments in order to satisfy the user experience needs found in this process.
This deliverable is a part of a project receiving funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 875052
usability and acceptability evaluation
usability and acceptability evaluation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 11 | |
| downloads | 17 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts