Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Der Beitrag basiert auf einer explorativen Umfrage, die Ende 2019 unter den zu dieser Zeit an Hochschulen und außerhochschulischen Forschungseinrichtungen tätigen Ombudspersonen zu den Rahmenbedingungen ihrer Tätigkeit durchgeführt wurde. Die Ergebnisse beleuchten zum einen vorhandene Maßnahmen zur Entlastung und Unterstützung von Ombudspersonen und loten zum anderen den Bedarf nach Fortbildung bzw. weitergehenden Ansätzen zur Professionalisierung des Ombudswesens aus. Erste Ergebnisse dieser Umfrage wurden von den Verfasserinnen im Rahmen eines Workshops auf dem Symposium des Ombudsman für die Wissenschaft im Februar 2020 sowie auf der Tagung des European Network of Research Integrity Offices (ENRIO) im September 2021 vorgestellt. The article is based on an exploratory survey conducted at the end of 2019 among ombudspersons working at universities and non-university research institutions on the framework conditions of their work. On the one hand, the results shed light on existing measures to relieve and support ombudspersons and, on the other hand, reflect on the need for further training and other approaches to professionalising the ombuds system. The first results of this survey were presented by the authors in a workshop at the symposium of the German Research Ombudsman in February 2020 and at the meeting of the European Network of Research Integrity Offices (ENRIO) in September 2021.
Gute wissenschaftliche Praxis, Ombudssystem, Ombudspersonen, research integrity, ombuds system, ombudsperson
Gute wissenschaftliche Praxis, Ombudssystem, Ombudspersonen, research integrity, ombuds system, ombudsperson
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 64 | |
| downloads | 47 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts