Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This rule based Tibetan part-of-speech (POS) tagger was prepared in the course of the research project 'Tibetan in Digital Communication' (2012-2015) hosted at SOAS, University of London and funded by the UK's Arts and Humanities Research Council (grant code: AH/J00152X/1). For a description of the tag set see Garrett et al. 2014. and Garrett et al. 2015. For a description of the tagger itself see Garrett et al. 2014. Note that the tagger must be used together with a lexicon (for example Hill & Garrett 2017a). One must use one's own script to tag all words with all tags in the lexicon and then apply the tagger to remove incorrect tags. On the associated corpus of 318,230 words (Hill & Garrett 2017b) the lexical tagger (i.e. simply applying all available tags to all words) tags 141,911 words with the correct unique tag, achieves as accuracy of 1.000 (by definition getting the right tag among others for each word) with an ambiguity of 2.73111. In contrast, the Rule Tagger tags 241,256 words with the correct unique tag, achieves an accuracy of 0.99893 and an ambiguity of 1.38577. Because this tagger does not achieve ambiguity 1.000 it is not suitable for tagging large scale corpora, but instead is useful for the creation of gold standard training data. N.B. In some rare cases the tagger removes all POS-tags.
{"references": ["Hill, Nathan W., & Garrett, Edward. (2017a). A part-of-speech (POS) lexicon of Classical Tibetan for NLP [Data set]. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.574876", "Hill, Nathan W., & Garrett, Edward. (2017b). A part-of-speech (POS) tagged corpus of Classical Tibetan [Data set]. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.574878"]}
funded by the UK's Arts and Humanities Research Council (grant code: AH/J00152X/1)
Part of speech tagging, corpus linguistics, Tibetan language
Part of speech tagging, corpus linguistics, Tibetan language
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 14 | |
| downloads | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts