Downloads provided by UsageCountsOpen Science Monitor 2020
Brinkman, Loek; De Haan, Judith; Van Hemert, Dani��l; De Laat, Joost; Rijshouwer, Dominique; Thomaes, Sander; Van Veelen, Ruth;
Open Science Monitor 2020
This is the first version of the Open Science monitor on awareness, attitudes and behaviours in relation to 10 open science practices. The monitor was conducted among academics at Utrecht University and UMC Utrecht (the Netherlands) in the summer of 2020 with the aim to gain insight in academics’ attitude and behaviours towards various open science practices, the opportunities these practices may provide for the scientific community and the barriers in implementing open science practices the researchers may experience. With this monitor the university hopes to gain insight into what can be done to facilitate and support open science among academics at Utrecht University.
Zenodo (2021). doi:10.5281/ZENODO.5725178
Published by Zenodo
Germany
- Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres Germany
- Utrecht University Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht Netherlands
- KU Leuven Belgium
- Forschungszentrum Jülich Germany
Open Source, Pre-registration, Research, Team Science, Transparency, Collaboration, Open Software, Reproducibility, Open Access, Recognition, Open Science, Impact, Stakeholders, Academia, Open Data, Open Materials, Pre-prints, Open Code, Rewards, Public Engagement, FAIR
Open Source, Pre-registration, Research, Team Science, Transparency, Collaboration, Open Software, Reproducibility, Open Access, Recognition, Open Science, Impact, Stakeholders, Academia, Open Data, Open Materials, Pre-prints, Open Code, Rewards, Public Engagement, FAIR
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).1 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average views 112 downloads 72 - 112views72downloads
selected citations
Citations provided by BIP!
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Citations provided by BIP!popularityPopularity provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
Popularity provided by BIP!influenceInfluence provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Influence provided by BIP!impulseImpulse provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
Impulse provided by BIP!viewsViews provided by UsageCounts
Views provided by UsageCountsdownloadsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts 1
Average
Average
Average
112
72
Green
Beta
Related to Research communities