Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Gypogyna amazonica Ruiz & Costa & Bustamante 2021, sp. nov.

Authors: Ruiz, Gustavo R. S.; Costa, Erika L. S.; Bustamante, Abel A.;

Gypogyna amazonica Ruiz & Costa & Bustamante 2021, sp. nov.

Abstract

Gypogyna amazonica Ruiz, sp. nov. Figs 45–46, 63 Type material. Holotype: ♂ from Rio Tarumã-Mirim, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, 05.VIII.1979, J. Adis (IBSP 67104). Etymology. The epithet is to be treated as a Latin adjective and refers to the Amazon forest, where the holotype was found. Diagnosis. Among the three species, G. amazonica sp. nov. is more similar to G. forceps. In these two, male chelicerae extend almost parallelly forward (they are more divergent in G. mexicana sp. nov.), and the distal pair of promarginal teeth (DPT) is located near the articulation of the fang (as in Fig. 51) (DPT is more basal in G. mexicana; Fig. 52). Also, the abdomen in these two species does not have several pairs of dorsal dark spots, as in G. mexicana (Figs 53–56). The male of G. amazonica can be distinguished from that of G. forceps by the clear abdomen, without the typical color pattern of G. forceps, and by having a narrower cymbium (middle portion of cymbium is much wider in G. forceps). The female of G. amazonica is unknown. Description. Male (holotype). Total length: 4.60. Carapace orange, 2.27 long, 1.54 wide, 0.97 high; intestinal diverticula can be seen within cephalic area through translucent cuticle. Ocular quadrangle 1.15 long. Anterior eye row 1.24 wide and posterior 1.19 wide. Labium, endites and sternum clear. Chelicera orange, as described to G. forceps. Palp as described for the genus (Figs 45–46). Legs 4312, yellow. Length: I 3.99 (1.32 + 1.15 + 1.52), II 3.73 (1.09 + 1.49 + 1.15), III 4.20 (1.45 + 1.61 + 1.14), IV 4.46 (1.65 + 1.38 + 1.43). Abdomen entirely clear, only with a pair of light areas in the middle, almost giving the impression of a constriction, and a small dark spot over the anal tubercle. Spinnerets brown. Female. Unknown. Distribution. Known only from the type locality (Fig. 63).

Published as part of Ruiz, Gustavo R. S., Costa, Erika L. S. & Bustamante, Abel A., 2021, Revision of Gypogyna Simon, 1900 (Araneae: Salticidae), pp. 241-259 in Zootaxa 5057 (2) on pages 248-250, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5057.2.5, http://zenodo.org/record/5588132

Related Organizations
Keywords

Arthropoda, Salticidae, Arachnida, Animalia, Araneae, Biodiversity, Gypogyna, Taxonomy, Gypogyna amazonica

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
Related to Research communities