Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.20944/preprints202109.0480.v2 , 10.33774/coe-2021-0xvfk-v4 , 10.33774/coe-2021-0xvfk-v2 , 10.33774/coe-2021-0xvfk , 10.20944/preprints202109.0480.v3 , 10.33774/coe-2021-0xvfk-v3 , 10.33774/coe-2021-0xvfk-v5 , 10.5281/zenodo.5565173 , 10.5281/zenodo.5560173 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.16780996.v5 , 10.5281/zenodo.5165741 , 10.5281/zenodo.5560296 , 10.5281/zenodo.5162533 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.16780996.v4 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.16780996.v6 , 10.5281/zenodo.5563194 , 10.5281/zenodo.5162534 , 10.5281/zenodo.5565447 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.16780996.v1 , 10.5281/zenodo.5173018 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.16780996 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.16780996.v3 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.16780996.v2
doi: 10.20944/preprints202109.0480.v2 , 10.33774/coe-2021-0xvfk-v4 , 10.33774/coe-2021-0xvfk-v2 , 10.33774/coe-2021-0xvfk , 10.20944/preprints202109.0480.v3 , 10.33774/coe-2021-0xvfk-v3 , 10.33774/coe-2021-0xvfk-v5 , 10.5281/zenodo.5565173 , 10.5281/zenodo.5560173 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.16780996.v5 , 10.5281/zenodo.5165741 , 10.5281/zenodo.5560296 , 10.5281/zenodo.5162533 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.16780996.v4 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.16780996.v6 , 10.5281/zenodo.5563194 , 10.5281/zenodo.5162534 , 10.5281/zenodo.5565447 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.16780996.v1 , 10.5281/zenodo.5173018 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.16780996 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.16780996.v3 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.16780996.v2
We define the function $\upsilon(x) = \frac{3 \times \log x + 5}{8 \times \pi \times \sqrt{x} + 1.2 \times \log x + 2} + \frac{\log x}{\log (x + C \times \sqrt{x} \times \log \log \log x)} - 1$ for some positive constant $C$ independent of $x$. We prove that the Riemann hypothesis is false when there exists some number $y \geq 13.1$ such that for all $x \geq y$ the inequality $\upsilon(x) \leq 0$ is always satisfied. We know that the function $\upsilon(x)$ is monotonically decreasing for all sufficiently large numbers $x \geq 13.1$. Hence, it is enough to find a value of $y \geq 13.1$ such that $\upsilon(y) \leq 0$ since for all $x \geq y$ we would have that $\upsilon(x) \leq \upsilon(y) \leq 0$. Using the tool $\textit{gp}$ from the project PARI/GP, we note that $\upsilon(100!) \approx \textit{-2.938735877055718770 E-39} < 0$ for all $C \geq \frac{1}{1000000!}$. In this way, we claim that the Riemann hypothesis could be false.
Prime numbers, Chebyshev function, prime numbers, algebra_number_theory, Riemann hypothesis, Nicolas inequality
Prime numbers, Chebyshev function, prime numbers, algebra_number_theory, Riemann hypothesis, Nicolas inequality
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 30 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts