Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This benchmark dataset is published with the article: Ilias Chalkidis, Abhik Jana, Dirk Hartung, Michael Bommarito, Ion Androutsopoulos, Daniel Martin Katz, and Nikolaos Aletras. 2021. LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English. ArXiv. Short Description Inspired by the recent widespread use of the GLUE multi-task benchmark NLP dataset (Wang et al., 2018), the subsequent more difficult SuperGLUE (Wang et al., 2019), other previous multi-task NLP benchmarks (Conneau and Kiela,2018; McCann et al., 2018), and similar initiatives in other domains (Peng et al., 2019), we introduce LexGLUE, a benchmark dataset to evaluate the performance of NLP methods in legal tasks. LexGLUE is based on seven existing legal NLP datasets: ECtHR Task A (Chalkidis et al., 2019) ECtHR Task B (Chalkidis et al., 2021a) SCOTUS (Spaeth et al., 2020) EUR-LEX (Chalkidis et al., 2021b) LEDGAR (Tuggener et al. (2020) UNFAIR-ToS (Lippi et al., 2019) CaseHOLD (Zheng et al., 2021)
legal, nlp
legal, nlp
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 86 | |
| downloads | 9K |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts