Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Book . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Book . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Book . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Epistemic Insight Digest: Issue 2 [Summer 2021]

Authors: David Chignall; Matthew Crook; Gayle Parker; Jasmine Wall; Murray Wilkinson;

Epistemic Insight Digest: Issue 2 [Summer 2021]

Abstract

PREFACE: Championing research engaged teaching and co-creation at CCCU The Epistemic Insight Initiative is designed to draw attention to a gap in education today - and to innovate solutions that help to address that gap. Of all the work we do across the Initiative - it is arguably the work by our students including our student teachers that gives us the most to celebrate and talk about. From the start, the EI Initiative was set up to enable tutors and students to work together - to co-create research studies and resources that can help to test, clarify and address a gap that research says - persists in classrooms today. We are the only university - to the best of my knowledge - that offers its students such a high profile, rich and embedded experience of being ‘research engaged’. By coming here our students have an opportunity to explore together a problem that unites and affects us all - and one which is at the frontiers of research. What does engaging with the research look like? It’s an experience that begins with our tutors introducing every student to EI and giving everyone an invitation to engage more deeply with the research. This is followed by a period of negotiation at each point in the journey - so that every student and every tutor is part of a shared conversation between us all while having the space to take the research towards the questions it generates for them and their own areas of interest. Why have a shared research agenda - exploring one gap which supposedly exists? We can ask our research question of every classroom, of every year group, in every school and of every curriculum subject. We can also ask it of our own experience of Big Questions and of questions that bridge disciplines, like, “How do we keep each other safe during a pandemic?” and “Is it true that you are what you eat?”, “What does it mean to be anxious?” and “Can a robot own its own thoughts?” As you look through the studies that follow - I hope you agree that here we can see the value and impact of a Faculty working together on one shared question to help to make education better. But - what is that question - and what gap? You’ll see it explained by each of the authors in the way that most fits the research they are doing. Or - and here’s the spoiler alert - if you’d like to have more of an idea before you start, here’s my version to help: The gap in education, identified through research, that motivates the Epistemic Insight Initiative: When we teach children about knowledge through the lens of each discipline in isolation - and test their ability to recall that knowledge - we leave out conversations which draw their attention to the different types of questions we are asking and exploring in each of our knowledge domains - and to the ways that disciplines can work together on Big Questions. We can address it by proposing and evaluating changes in school or by revisiting our own understanding of what it means to ‘know’ and how we know what we know. But that’s the problem the way I see it - so now please read the wonderful papers in this year’s Digest to explore what this gap looks like and how we can respond to it - across the range of specialisms, professions and activities we do.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Pedagogy, Secondary Education, Cross Curricular Learning, Epistemic Insight, COVID-19 and Education

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 10
    download downloads 7
  • 10
    views
    7
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
10
7
Green
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs: