Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Although the mass loss of massive stars is of prime importance for their evolution, it is still not well understood. Stellar modelling relies on wind prescriptions that are implemented in 1D evolution codes, but many uncertainties remain. In any case, stellar models cannot follow mass loss burst episodes, like the one that Betelgeuse has undergone last winter. They rely on averaged mass-loss rates, but is there such a thing, from an observational point of view? Can we check wether the winds prescriptions are correct or not? How modifying the mass-loss rates during the RSG phase changes the endpoint of massive stars evolution? I will review our current understanding on these questions from the theoretical point of view.
Stars: evolution, Stars: mass-loss, supergiants, Stars: individual: Betelgeuse
Stars: evolution, Stars: mass-loss, supergiants, Stars: individual: Betelgeuse
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 23 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts