Views provided by UsageCounts
Charisia bleuzeni (Peñaherrera-Leiva and Tavakilian, 2003), comb. nov. (Fig. 29, 30) Epimelitta bleuzeni Peñaherrera-Leiva and Tavakilian, 2003:208; Monné 2016:810 (cat.). Comment. Unfortunately specimens of Charisia bleuzeni (originally described from a single female) were not available for study (but excellent photographs of both sexes provided enough detail for those characters mentioned in the text). The species could probably be placed in a genus of its own. It has a general resemblance to Charisia melanaria, but differs from all the species of Charisia by the well developed tufts of setae on the metatibia, and the shape of the male’s abdomen. It cannot be placed in Epimelitta s. str. because the forebody is distinctly shorter than abdomen; the prothorax is widest near middle; the integument is black; and the body pubescence is not orange in color. Nor can it be placed in Exepimelitta because the pronotum is subquadrate, not strongly transverse; the general body pubescence is reduced, the pronotum lacking the dense, long setae of the transverse depression, the urosternites lacking hairy tufts; and the apex of the metafemora lack the characteristic fascia of white hairs.
Published as part of Clarke, Robin O. S., Flora, Hotel, Fauna, Casilla, de, Santa Cruz, Sierra & Bolivia, 2016, Provisional revision of the genus Epimelitta Bates, 1870 and associated genera, with a brief synopsis of the genus Acorethra Bates, 1873 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae), pp. 1-43 in Insecta Mundi 2016 (504) on page 22, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5170799
Coleoptera, Charisia bleuzeni, Insecta, Arthropoda, Charisia, Cerambycidae, Animalia, Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Coleoptera, Charisia bleuzeni, Insecta, Arthropoda, Charisia, Cerambycidae, Animalia, Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts