Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Pholetesor

Authors: Liu, Zhen; He, Jun-Hua; Chen, Xue-Xin;
Abstract

Key to species of genus Pholetesor from China 1. Metacarp at most 1.5× longer than its distance from apex of marginal cell; hind coxa mainly yellow; horizontal surface of T1 strongly shining, almost polished........................................................ P. pedias Nixon, 1973 - Metacarp much longer, about 4× longer than its distance from apex of marginal cell................................. 2 2. Anterior margin of postscutellum without a distinct emargination between its middle point and forward-pointing projection, phragma completely concealed or only slightly exposed....................................................... 3 - Anterior margin of postscutellum with a deep emargination between its middle point and forward-pointing projection, phragma freely exposed........................................................................................ 8 3. Ovipositor sheath strongly expanding towards apex and truncated in profile; apical part of T1 and T2 densely rugose all over............................................................................ P. viminetorum (Wesmael, 1837) - Ovipositor sheath not truncated in profile................................................................... 4 4. T1 virtually parallel-sided; T2 rectangular rather than triangular; T1 and T2 strongly rugose all over................................................................................................. P. maritimus (Wilkinson, 1941) - T1 distinctly narrowed posteriorly; T2 triangular or trapezoidal; T1 and T2 slightly uneven to weakly rugose............. 5 5. Scutellar sulcus more or less foveolate and broader........................................................... 6 - Scutellar sulcus remarkably narrow and without carinae in between.............................................. 7 6. T1-3 yellow; vein cu-a of hind wing straight; spines on outer side of hind tibia relatively sparser................................................................................................... P. flavigleba Liu & Chen, sp. n. - T1-3 dark; vein cu-a of hind wing strongly curved; spines on outer side of hind tibia markedly denser.............................................................................................. P. spinadensus Liu & Chen, sp. n. 7. Apical third of hind tibia and hind tarsus distinctly blackish; penultimate antennomere 2× longer than wide; vein cu-a of hind wing curved................................................................ P. taiwanensis Liu & Chen, sp. n. - Apical third of hind tibia and hind tarsus at most faintly fulvous; penultimate antennomere only 1.6× longer than wide; vein cu-a of hind wing straight and oblique inwards.................................... P. artusisulcus Liu & Chen, sp. n. 8. Apical part of T1 and T2 densely rugose all over............................................................. 9 - Apical part of T1 and T2 strongly shining, almost polished to weakly rugose...................................... 11 9. T2 subrectangular or very transverse, T1 narrowed posteriorly................................................. 10 - T2 nearly triangular; T1 not much narrowed posteriorly, nearly parallel-sided................... P. salalicus Mason, 1959 10. T2 very obviously transverse; rugosity on apical T1 very strong; T1 weakly narrowed posteriorly....................................................................................................... P. laetus (Marshall, 1885) - T2 subrectangular; rugosity on apical T1 less strong; T1 remarkably narrowed posteriorly.......... P. arisba (Nixon, 1973) 11. T2 highly triangular, usually only 1.4-1.7× wider than long in the middle........................................ 12 - T2 subtriangular to very transverse, at least 2× wider than long in the middle..................................... 14 12. Ocelli on low triangle; T1 punctate-subrugulose all over.............................. P. acricauda Liu & Chen, sp. n. - Ocelli on high triangle; T1 usually highly polished.......................................................... 13 13. Pterostigma relatively big, 2.4× as long as its widest part; ocelli small, distance between fore and a hind ocellus larger than diameter of hind ocellus; T1 slightly narrowing towards apex......................... P. lithocolletis Liu & Chen, sp. n. - Pterostigma smaller, 2.8-3× as long as its widest part; ocelli relatively large, distance between fore and a hind ocellus as long as diameter of hind ocellus; T1 strongly narrowing towards apex.......................... P. circumscriptus (Nees, 1834) 14. Scutellar sulcus narrow with carinae in between; ovipositor sheath relatively long, almost as long as hind tibia; hind femur brown.............................................................................................. 15 - Scutellar sulcus without carina in between; ovipositor sheath relatively short, distinctly shorter than hind tibia; hind femur yel- low................................................................................................ 16 15. Ovipositor sheath remarkably thick; propodeum relatively long, less than twice as wide as long; 1st discal cell as wide as high......................................................................... P. argyresthiae Liu & Chen, sp. n. - Ovipositor sheath thin; propodeum relatively short, at least 2× wider than long; 1st discal cell distinctly wider than high................................................................................. P. lyonetiae Liu & Chen, sp. n. 16. Body mostly dark, hind coxa brown; spurs of hind tibia of equal size, 2/5 length of basitarsus; punctures on disc of mesonotum relatively deep and distinct................................................... P. teresitergum Liu & Chen, sp. n. - Body mostly yellow, hind coxa yellow; inner spur of hind tibia longer than outer spur, almost half length of basitarsus, outer spur almost 1/3; punctures on disc of mesonotum relatively shallow and weak.................................... 17 17. Suture between T2 and T3 distinct; vein r not shorter than 2-SR; T2 triangular; vein cu-a of hind wing strongly curved................................................................................ P. flaviparvus Liu & Chen, sp. n. - Suture between T2 and T3 weak; vein r distinctly shorter than 2-SR; T2 trapezoidal; vein cu-a of hind wing straight and per- pendicular to vein 1-1A......................................................... P. confusus Liu & Chen, sp. n.

Published as part of Liu, Zhen, He, Jun-Hua & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2016, The genus Pholetesor Mason, 1981 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae) from China, with descriptions of eleven new species, pp. 351-387 in Zootaxa 4150 (4) on pages 352-353, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4150.4.1, http://zenodo.org/record/267594

Keywords

Braconidae, Insecta, Arthropoda, Pholetesor, Animalia, Biodiversity, Hymenoptera, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
  • 3
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
Related to Research communities