Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity denote a diversity of practices and present specific challenges to collaboration in research and education. One of those challenges is the integration of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (AHSS). The roles these disciplines perform in inter-and transdisciplinary research and education are often mostly limited to instrumental and subordinate ones. Unequal participation of these disciplines causes their exclusion from scientific communities, also affecting career paths of early and senior researchers. I present some results from the project entitled «Shaping interdisciplinary practices in Europe» (SHAPE-ID) that addresses the problem of how to better integrate AHSS disciplines in interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity. I conducted a systematic literature review and identified spaces in which integration is performed and roles that AHSS researchers fruitfully develop in an inter-or transdisciplinary setting. I discuss how to facilitate the participation of AHSS researchers by reconfiguring inter-and transdisciplinary spaces and roles. I conclude that AHSS disciplines’ participation in collaborative settings is limited and affects the type of inter-and transdisciplinary knowledge production processes that are driven. This has a direct effect on how senior researchers perceive their academic careers and set the research agenda. But also, on how early career researchers build their academic future. Published in Revista Educaonline v.15, n. 2 (May/August 2021)
Published in Revista Educaonline v.15, n. 2 (May/August 2021)
interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, integration, roles, Arts Humanities and Social Sciences
interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, integration, roles, Arts Humanities and Social Sciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 59 | |
| downloads | 28 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts