Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This dataset contains the models for interpretable Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) that were employed in Panchenko et al. (2017; the paper can be accessed at https://www.lt.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Group_LangTech/publications/EACL_Interpretability___FINAL__1_.pdf). The files were computed on a 2015 dump from the English Wikipedia. Their contents: Induced Sense Inventories: wp_stanford_sense_inventories.tar.gz This file contains 3 inventories (coarse, medium fine) Language Model (3-gram): wiki_text.3.arpa.gz This file contains all n-grams up to n=3 and can be loaded into an index Weighted Dependency Features: wp_stanford_lemma_LMI_s0.0_w2_f2_wf2_wpfmax1000_wpfmin2_p1000.gz This file contains weighted word--context-feature combinations and includes their count and an LMI significance score Distributional Thesaurus (DT) of Dependency Features: wp_stanford_lemma_BIM_LMI_s0.0_w2_f2_wf2_wpfmax1000_wpfmin2_p1000_simsortlimit200_feature expansion.gz This file contains a DT of context features. The context feature similarities can be used for context expansion For further information, consult the paper and the companion page: http://jobimtext.org/wsd/ Panchenko A., Ruppert E., Faralli S., Ponzetto S. P., and Biemann C. (2017): Unsupervised Does Not Mean Uninterpretable: The Case for Word Sense Induction and Disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL'2017). Valencia, Spain. Association for Computational Linguistics.
word sense inventory, language model, wsd
word sense inventory, language model, wsd
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 9 | |
| downloads | 7 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts