Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Software . 2021
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Software . 2021
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Software . 2021
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

mjrubino/USNVC-Analyses: Quantifying the Representation of Plant Communities in the Protected Areas of the U.S.

Authors: Mjrubino;

mjrubino/USNVC-Analyses: Quantifying the Representation of Plant Communities in the Protected Areas of the U.S.

Abstract

To monitor how well plant communities of the U.S. are being conserved we need core datasets at the appropriate thematic, spatial and temporal resolution. The recent release of the LANDFIRE Existing Vegetation Dataset (2016 Remap) with a legend based on the Group level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification allowed us to assess the conservation status of plant communities of the U.S. By combining the Group level map with the Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US Ver 2.01) we were able to quantify the level of representation. Because the classification is hierarchical, we can generalize the analysis to describe management and conservation patterns at each of the higher levels of the classification as well (Class, Subclass, Formation, Division, and Macrogroup). We assembled attributes from the spatial data in a coded workflow using Python (version 3.6)(Python Software Foundation) and the pandas library (version 1.1.2)(pandas development team 2020). In the workflow, documented in a Jupyter notebook, we conducted analyses to quantify representation of plant communities throughout CONUS. We compiled raster cell counts in the spatial data using four summarizations: • Percent of mapped area designated protected (PAD Status 1 & 2) and multiple use (PAD Status 1, 2, & 3) for USNVC Groups across five USNVC Classes • Areal extent of protected (PAD Status 1 & 2), and multiple use (PAD Status 1, 2, & 3) of five USNVC Classes by land manager (Bureau of Land Management; USDA Forest Service; National Park Service; US Fish & Wildlife Service; Other Federal, State; and Other) • Protection level (PAD Status 1 & 2) of USNVC Groups and Macrogroups within four percentage categories (< 1% Protected, 1 – 17% Protected, 17 – 30% Protected, > 30% Protected) across Level II Ecoregions • Protection percentage (PAD Status 1 & 2, PAD Status 3, PAD Status 4-Converted, PAD Status 4-Not Converted) of lands within Level II Ecoregions where "Converted" are lands that have been converted to intensive uses (agriculture, urban, etc...) and "Not Converted" are lands representing natural, ruderal or plantation vegetation.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
  • 3
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
Related to Research communities