Views provided by UsageCounts
Arsapnia coyote (Nelson & Baumann) Coyote Snowfly (Figs. 67-72) Capnia coyote Nelson & Baumann, 1987b:487. Holotype ♂, (United States National Museum), Little Rock Creek, Cooper Canyon Campground, San Gabriel Mountains, Los Angeles Co., California http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn:lsid:Plecoptera.speciesfile.org: TaxonName:4978 Arsapnia coyote: Murányi, Gamboa & Orci, 2014:14 http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn.lsid:Plecoptera.speciesfile.org: TaxonName:465452 Material examined. USA: California: Los Angeles Co., Little Rock Creek, Cooper Canyon Campground, San Gabriel Mountains, 31 March 1981, R. W. Baumann, J. Stanger, 3♂ (BYUC). San Bernardino Co., East Fork of West Fork before Mohave River above Silverwood Lake, 9 January 1988, R.W. Baumann, C. R. Nelson, 1♂ (BYUC). Male epiproct (n = 2). Length 575-618 μm, width at midlength 223-236 μm, Body of epiproct expanded into convex ear-like lobes near midlength (Figs. 67, 70). Width across neck 67-83 μm. Shape and general structure similar to those of populations of A. decepta examined. Left side setal spines in clusters of 25-28, and 28-32 on the right. Tergal process (n = 2). Bearing a slight to moderate notch of posteromedian margin (Figs. 67-70). Dorsolateral lobes bearing patches of small conical tubercles. Width of process across anterior margin 200-280 μm. Comments. Arsapnia coyote is presently considered an endemic to southern California and the sister species of A. decepta (Nelson & Baumann 1987b). The two species overlap in many morphological features including epiproct width and setal spine counts, however two of the three longest epiprocts among specimens studied are of this species, and the epiproct length/width ratios (2.58 and 2.61 respectively, Table 6) for these two specimens are the highest observed. Nelson & Baumann (1987b) distinguished the two species, in part, by virtue of a flatter dorsal epiproct surface and smaller epiproct depth (compare Figs. 69 and 72 with Figs. 4 and 18). Recently, Heinold et al. (2014) supported recognition of A. coyote as a distinct species based on their report of an average genetic divergence of 1.9% between males of A. coyote and A. decepta.
{"references": ["Nelson, C. R. & R. W. Baumann. 1987 b. New winter stoneflies of the genus Capnia with notes and an annotated checklist of the Capniidae of California (Plecoptera: Capniidae). Entomography, 5: 485 - 521.", "Muranyi, D., M. Gamboa, & K. M. Orci. 2014. Zwicknia gen. n., a new genus for the Capnia bifrons species group, with descriptions of three new species based on morphology, drumming signals and molecular genetics, and a synopsis of the West Palearctic and Nearctic genera of Capniidae (Plecoptera). Zootaxa, 3812: 1 - 82.", "Heinold, B. D., B. A. Gill, T. P. Belcher, & C. J. Verdone. 2014. Discovery of new populations and DNA barcoding of the Arapahoe snowfly Arsapnia arapahoe (Plecoptera: Capniidae). Zootaxa, 3866: 131 - 137."]}
Published as part of Baumann, Richard W. & Stark, Bill P., 2017, Variation In The Epiproct Of Arsapnia Decepta Banks, 1897 (Plecoptera: Capniidae), With Comments On Arsapnia Coyote (Nelson & Baumann 1987), pp. 1-21 in Illiesia 13 (1) on pages 17-20, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4761024
Insecta, Arsapnia, Arthropoda, Plecoptera, Arsapnia coyote, Capniidae, Animalia, Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Insecta, Arsapnia, Arthropoda, Plecoptera, Arsapnia coyote, Capniidae, Animalia, Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts