Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2016
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

A Workflow For Creating, Analysing, And Storing Multi-Layer Corpora: Pepper, Atomic, Annis And Laudatio

Authors: Druskat, Stephan; Krause, Thomas; Odebrecht, Carolin; Zipser, Florian;

A Workflow For Creating, Analysing, And Storing Multi-Layer Corpora: Pepper, Atomic, Annis And Laudatio

Abstract

The creation and analysis of corpus linguistic resources can be a costly and error-prone process. Apart from the complexity of the annotation process itself, there are larger technical obstacles to be overcome. Single tools have to be combined in a common workflow, and different formats taken into account. This poster presents a family of well-aligned open source tools which support the conversion, annotation, and analysis of linguistic corpora, as well as securing their long-term accessibility, in a complete workflow. The interoperability of these tools is guaranteed by the use of a common data model – Salt (Zipser & Romary, 2010) – which, among other things, is used as an intermediate model for the conversion framework Pepper (Zipser et al., 2011). With Pepper, many linguistic formats can be converted into each other, thereby allowing existing data to be included in the workflow. The support for a multitude of linguistic formats allows for the replacement of single components as well as the integration of further tools into the workflow presented here. The annotation of corpora is carried out in Atomic (Druskat et al., 2014), an extensible annotation platform. Atomic also utilizes Salt – in this case as its concrete data model – and thus allows for theory-neutral annotation which is independent of tagsets and annotation types. By embedding Pepper, it supports a wide variety of source formats for further annotation, as well as target formats for export. Additionally, its plugin-based architecture makes it possible to easily extend the software, e.g., with additional editors, data views, or processing components. For a new annotation type, for instance, a dedicated editor can thus be created and integrated. At any point in the annotation process, the annotated data can be transferred to the search and visualization tool ANNIS (Krause & Zeldes, 2014) for visualisation and analysis. Conclusions from the analysis can then, for example, also flow back into the annotation process. When a corpus is ready for publication, it can be released in different formats to a public repository – in the case of historical text corpora, for example, the LAUDATIO-Repository (Odebrecht et al., 2015). Third parties can then download, reference and re-use the data.

{"references": ["Druskat, Stephan, Lennart Bierkandt, Volker Gast, Christoph Rzymski & Florian Zipser. 2014. Atomic: an open-source software platform for multi-level corpus annotation. In Josef Ruppert & Gertrud Faa\u00df (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Konferenz zur Verarbeitung nat\u00fcrlicher Sprache (KONVENS 2014), 228\u2013234.", "Krause, Thomas & Amir Zeldes. 2014. ANNIS3: A new architecture for generic corpus query and visualization. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu057.", "Odebrecht, Carolin, Thomas Krause & Anke L\u00fcdeling. 2015. Austausch von historischen Texten verschiedener Sprachen \u00fcber das LAUDATIO-Repository. Poster presented at 37. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft f\u00fcr Sprachwissenschaft, 5 March, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.", "Voigt, Vivian, Florian Zipser & Carolin Odebrecht. 2016. SaltInfoModule - the x-ray to your corpus. Poster presented at 38. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft f\u00fcr Sprachwissenschaft, 25 February, Konstanz University, Konstanz, Germany.", "Zipser, Florian & Laurent Romary. 2010. A model oriented approach to the mapping of annotation formats using standards. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Language Resource and Language Technology Standards, Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010), Valletta, Malta.", "Zipser, Florian, Amir Zeldes, Julia Ritz, Laurent Romary & Ulf Leser. 2011. Pepper: Handling a multiverse of formats. Poster presented at 33. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft f\u00fcr Sprachwissenschaft, 24 February, G\u00f6ttingen University, G\u00f6ttingen, Germany."]}

Poster, DGfS-CL Poster Session 2016, Konstanz, February 2015.

Keywords

atomic, annis, salt, pepper, laudatio, corpus-tools.org, linguistics, annotation, software, open source, poster, extensibility, linguistic corpus, annotation tool, multi-layer, annotation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 6
    download downloads 14
  • 6
    views
    14
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
6
14
Green