Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Continental Europe Digital Terrain Model at 30 m resolution based on GEDI, ICESat-2, AW3D, GLO-30, EUDEM, MERIT DEM and background layers

Authors: Hengl, Tomislav; Leal Parente, Leandro; Krizan, Josip; Bonannella, Carmelo;

Continental Europe Digital Terrain Model at 30 m resolution based on GEDI, ICESat-2, AW3D, GLO-30, EUDEM, MERIT DEM and background layers

Abstract

Digital Terrain Model for Continental Europe based on the three publicly available Digital Surface Models and predicted using an Ensemble Machine Learning (EML). EML was trainined using GEDI level 2B points (Level 2A; "elev_lowestmode") and ICESat-2 (ATL08; "h_te_mean"): about 9 million points were overlaid vs MERITDEM, AW3D30, GLO-30, EU DEM, GLAD canopy height, tree cover and surface water cover maps, then an ensemble prediction model (mlr package in R) was fitted using random forest, Cubist and GLM, and used to predict most probable terrain height (bare earth). Input layers used to train the EML include: "lcv_bare.earth_glcf.landsat": UMD GLAD bare earth estimate for year 2010 based on Landsat time series, "dtm_elev.dsm_alos.aw3d": Digital Surface Model based on ALOS AW3D, "dtm_canopy.height_glad.umd": UMD GLAD canopy height for 2019 based on GEDI data, "dtm_elev.dsm_eudem.eea": Copernicus EU DEM based on the SRTM and ASTER DEMs, "hyd_surface.water_jrc.gswe": JRC Global Surface Water Explorer surface water probability based on the Landsat time-series, "lcv_landcover.12_pflugmacher2019": land cover map of Europe at 30 based on Pflugmacher et al. (2019), "lcv_tree.cover_umd.landsat_2000": forest tree cover for year 2000 based on the Global Forest Change data, "lcv_tree.cover_umd.landsat_2010": forest tree cover for year 2010 based on the Global Forest Change data, Detailed processing steps can be found here. Read more about the processing steps here. Training data set can be obtained in the file "gedi_elev.lowestmode_2019_eumap.RDS". The initial linear model fitted using the four independent Digital Surface / Digital Terrain models shows: Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -124.627 -1.097 0.973 2.544 59.324 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) -1.6220640 0.0032415 -500.4 <2e-16 *** eu_dem25m_ -0.1092988 0.0005531 -197.6 <2e-16 *** eu_AW3Dv2012_30m_ 0.0933774 0.0005957 156.7 <2e-16 *** eu_GLO30_30m_ 0.2637153 0.0006062 435.1 <2e-16 *** eu_MERITv1.0.1_30m_ 0.7496494 0.0005009 1496.6 <2e-16 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 7.059 on 9588230 degrees of freedom (2046196 observations deleted due to missingness) Multiple R-squared: 0.9996, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9996 F-statistic: 5.343e+09 on 4 and 9588230 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16 Which show that MERIT DEM (Yamazaki et al., 2019) is the most correlated DEM with GEDI and ICESat-2, most likely because it has been systematically post-processed and majority of canopy problems have been removed. Summary results of the model training (mlr::makeStackedLearner) using all covariates (including canopy height, tree cover, bare earth cover) shows: Variable: elev_lowestmode.f R-square: 1 Fitted values sd: 333 RMSE: 6.54 Ensemble model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -118.788 -0.871 0.569 1.956 165.119 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) -0.198402 0.003045 -65.15 <2e-16 *** regr.ranger 0.452543 0.001117 405.04 <2e-16 *** regr.cubist 0.527011 0.001516 347.61 <2e-16 *** regr.glm 0.020033 0.001217 16.47 <2e-16 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 6.544 on 9588231 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.9996, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9996 F-statistic: 8.29e+09 on 3 and 9588231 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16 Which indicates that the elevation errors are in average (2/3rd of pixels) between +1-2 m. The variable importance based on Random Forest package ranger shows: Variable importance: variable importance 4 eu_MERITv1.0.1_30m_ 430641370770 1 eu_AW3Dv2012_30m_ 291483345389 2 eu_GLO30_30m_ 201517488587 3 eu_dem25m_ 132742500162 9 eu_canopy_height_30m_ 5148617173 7 bare2010_ 2087304901 8 treecover2000_ 1761597272 6 treecover2010_ 141670217 The output predicted terrain model includes the following two layers: "dtm_elev.lowestmode_gedi.eml_mf": mean estimate of the terrain elevation in dm (decimeters) filtered using Gaussian filter and 2x pixel window in SAGA GIS, "dtm_elev.lowestmode_gedi.eml_md": standard deviation of the independently fitted stacked predictors quantifying the prediction uncertainty in dm (decimeters), The predicted elevations are based on the GEDI data hence the reference water surface (WGS84 ellipsoid) is about 43 m higher than the sea water surface for a specific EU country. Before modeling, we have corrected the reference elevations to the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008) by using the 5-arcdegree resolution correction surface (Pavlis et al, 2012). All GeoTIFFs were prepared using Integer format (elevations rounded to 1 m) and have been converted to Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs using GDAL. Disclaimer: The output DTM still shows forest canopy (overestimation of the terrain elevation) and has not been hydrologically corrected for spurious sinks and similar. This data set is continuously updated. To report a bug or suggest an improvement, please visit here. To access DTM derivatives at 30-m, 100-m and 250-m please visit here. To register for updates please subscribe to: https://twitter.com/HarmonizerGeo.

{"references": ["Bischl, B., Lang, M., Kotthoff, L., Schiffner, J., Richter, J., Studerus, E., ... & Jones, Z. M. (2016). mlr: Machine Learning in R. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17(1), 5938-5942.", "Grohmann, C. H. (2018). Evaluation of TanDEM-X DEMs on selected Brazilian sites: Comparison with SRTM, ASTER GDEM and ALOS AW3D30. Remote Sensing of Environment, 212, 121-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.04.043", "Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., ... & Kommareddy, A. (2013). High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. science, 342(6160), 850-853.", "Neuenschwander, A. L., & Magruder, L. A. (2019). Canopy and terrain height retrievals with ICESat-2: A first look. Remote sensing, 11(14), 1721. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11141721", "Pekel, J. F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N., & Belward, A. S. (2016). High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature, 540(7633), 418-422.", "Pflugmacher, D., Rabe, A., Peters, M., & Hostert, P. (2019). Mapping pan-European land cover using Landsat spectral-temporal metrics and the European LUCAS survey. Remote sensing of environment, 221, 583-595.", "Potapov, P., X. Li, A. Hernandez-Serna, A. Tyukavina, M.C. Hansen, A. Kommareddy, A. Pickens, S. Turubanova, H. Tang, C.E. Silva, J. Armston, R. Dubayah, J. B. Blair, M. Hofton (2020) Mapping and monitoring global forest canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data. In review", "Takaku, J., & Tadono, T. (2017). Quality updates of 'AW3D'global DSM generated from ALOS PRISM. In 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Igarss) (pp. 5666-5669). IEEE.", "Uuemaa, E., Ahi, S., Montibeller, B., Muru, M., & Kmoch, A. (2020). Vertical Accuracy of Freely Available Global Digital Elevation Models (ASTER, AW3D30, MERIT, TanDEM-X, SRTM, and NASADEM). Remote Sensing, 12(21), 3482. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213482", "Yamazaki, D., Ikeshima, D., Sosa, J., Bates, P. D., Allen, G. H., & Pavelsky, T. M. (2019). MERIT Hydro: a high\u2010resolution global hydrography map based on latest topography dataset. Water Resources Research, 55(6), 5053-5073. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024873"]}

This work has received funding from the European Union's the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) under Grant Agreement Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) Telecom project 2018-EU-IA-0095 (https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-telecom/2018-eu-ia-0095).

Keywords

Europe, elevation data, digital terrain model, ensemble machine learning, geomorphometry, GEDI, ICESat-2

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 475
    download downloads 115
  • 475
    views
    115
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
8
Top 10%
Average
Average
475
115
Related to Research communities