Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

MItosis DOmain Generalization Challenge (MICCAI-MIDOG 2021) Training Data

Authors: Marc Aubreville; Christof A. Bertram; Nikolas Stathonikos; Mitko Veta; Taryn Donovan; Natalie ter Hoeve; Francesco Ciompi; +5 Authors

MItosis DOmain Generalization Challenge (MICCAI-MIDOG 2021) Training Data

Abstract

We present the training dataset of the MICCAI-MIDOG 2021 challenge. The task of the challenge is the generalization of the detection of mitotic figures to multiple microscopy whole slide image scanners. The data set consists of 200 cases of human breast cancer. Each of the images was cropped from a whole slide image. The region for cropping was selected by a pathologist according to current guidelines. All images come from the same lab (UMC Utrecht) and have thus similar staining intensity, i.e. all visible differences in representation can be attributed to a different digital representation by the acquisition device. The images 001.tiff to 050.tiff were acquired with a Hamamatsu XR scanner. The images 051.tiff to 100.tiff were acquired with a Hamamatsu S360 scanner. The images 101.tiff to 150.tiff were acquired with an Aperio CS2 scanner. The images 151.tiff to 200.tiff were acquired with a Leica GT450 scanner. The cases of all scanners represent a similar distribution of tumor grades. The complete collection of cases represents consecutive cases from the archive that were qualified according to inclusion criteria. The file MIDOG.json represents all annotations in MS COCO format. Please note that we did include not only mitotic figure annotations but also annotations where experts disagreed or that qualify as hard examples for machine learning. The challenge description can be found at http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4573978.

Keywords

mitotic figure, domain adaptation, mitosis detection, domain generalization

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 239
    download downloads 3K
  • 239
    views
    3K
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
2
Average
Average
Average
239
3K
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research