Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2013
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2013
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2013
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Lonchura monticola subsp. myolae Restall

Authors: LeCroy, Mary;

Lonchura monticola subsp. myolae Restall

Abstract

Lonchura monticola myolae Restall Lonchura monticola myolae Restall, 1995: 145 (Mt. Scratchley and Mt. Knotsford [sic], Owen Stanley Range, Papua New Guinea). Now Lonchura monticola (De Vis, 1897). See LeCroy, 1999: 216–217; Dickinson, 2003: 736; and Payne, 2010: 373–374. LECTOTYPE: AMNH 721471 (not 421471), unsexed, collected on Mount Scratchley, 08.40S, 147.30E (PNG General Reference Map, 1984), Owen Stanley Mountains, Papua New Guinea, undated, collector not noted. From the Rothschild Collection. COMMENTS: Restall designated syntypes in the original description by citing (incorrectly) the AMNH numbers. The second listed syntype was AMNH 721469 (not 421469) from Mount Knutsford (not Knotsford) in the Owen Stanley Mountains south of Mount Scratchley. According to Rothschild and Hartert (1915: 55) both of these specimens were collected by A.S. Anthony. Restall said that the type locality of nominate Lonchura monticola was Mount ‘‘Edward Albert’’; however, its type locality is not Mount Albert Edward, but is Mount Scratchley, the same as that from which he named myolae. For a discussion of these localities and the types of Lonchura monticola, see LeCroy (1999: 216–217). Because the syntypes of myolae are from different localities and the position of the two localities were confused in the original description, I (LeCroy, 1999: 216) designated AMNH 721471 from Mount Scratchley as the lectotype of L. m. myolae. Thus it becomes a topotypical synonym of the nominate form. The specimens in AMNH, including the paralectotype, AMNH 721469, from Mount Knutsford do not appear to differ from Mount Scratchley specimens. Although Hicks (1987: 60) observed L. monticola at Myola and reported it as a downward extension of range, he noted no color differences and there are no specimens known from Myola. Sharpe (1898: 60) described Munia nigritorquis from Mt. Albert Edward. M. nigritorquis has been shown to be a synonym of L. monticola (Mayr 1941: 222). Thus, the known range of L. monticola extends from Mount Albert Edward, 08.25S, 147.25E, at least to Mount Knutsford, 08.50S, 147.27E, in the Owen Stanley Mountains, including the Wharton Range.

Published as part of LeCroy, Mary, 2013, Type Specimens Of Birds In The American Museum Of Natural History Part 11. Passeriformes: Parulidae, Drepanididae, Vireonidae, Icteridae, Fringillinae, Carduelinae, Estrildidae, And Viduinae, pp. 1-155 in Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2013 (381) on page 125, DOI: 10.1206/832.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4611863

Keywords

Lonchura monticola myolae restall, Estrildidae, Animalia, Biodiversity, Passeriformes, Lonchura, Chordata, Aves, Lonchura monticola, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
  • 3
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
Green