Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The report "Open Access Publishing" contains extensive information from an empirical evaluation of the funding programme with which the DFG has been supporting the gold route of open access since 2010. The study is based on a bibliometric analysis carried out by Forschungszentrum Jülich. An online survey was also conducted among 82 funded and non-funded institutions, which shared both their experiences of funding and assessments of future needs in relation to open access funding from the DFG. The surveys were supplemented by more detailed interviews. This part of the evaluation was carried out by JOANNEUM RESEARCH. Between 2010 and 2016, 45 universities received funding through the programme. During this period, these institutions published almost 12,000 articles through gold open access with the help of the programme (including the universities' own contributions). Most of the funded articles were in the life sciences. The number of articles funded each year rose steadily throughout the period. The effects of funding in the Open Access Publishing programme can be seen in the organisation and structures of the institutions. In addition to the establishment of workflows and funds to cover costs, the funding promoted measures to record and monitor publication figures. Over half of the funding recipients surveyed used the DFG funds to bring acquisition and open access organisationally closer together or merge them, and to stimulate the transformation from a subscription to an open access model.
The study was prepared by JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH in Graz u. Wien, Forschungszentrum Jülich and ECOOM KU Leuven on behalf of the German Research Foundation.
Publishing, Open Access, German Research Foundation, Gold Open Access, DFG, Journals, Open Access Publizieren, APC, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publishing, Open Access, German Research Foundation, Gold Open Access, DFG, Journals, Open Access Publizieren, APC, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 94 | |
| downloads | 63 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts