Downloads provided by UsageCounts
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>The examples in the database Adjective‑Adverb Interfaces in Romance (=aaif) are lemmatized and tagged according to a shared annotation model, using the same categories for different Romance languages and corpora. Thus, the annotation model offers a cross‑linguistic categorization based on the forms, functions and meanings of the heterogeneous and multifunctional word‑class adverb, which could also be applied to other languages besides Romance (e.g. for English). The following description of the tags and their definitions is an extensive repertoire of the possibilities offered by the aaif‑annotation tool and aims at a transparent and operational systematization.
linguistic annotation, corpus linguistics, adverbs, Romance corpus
linguistic annotation, corpus linguistics, adverbs, Romance corpus
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 20 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts