Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Key prerequisites for a Europe-wide gender equality scheme

Authors: Tzanakou, Charikleia; Chilcott, Shireen; Clayton-Hathway, Kate; Humbert, Anne Laure;

Key prerequisites for a Europe-wide gender equality scheme

Abstract

This report outlines the set of key prerequisites (i.e., ‘must haves’ and ‘nice to haves’) for an effective award/certification system for gender equality in higher education research and innovation. It is based on the critical review of key debates and considerations for the architecture of a Europe-wide scheme drawing from opinions of 74 stakeholders across Europe and beyond, complemented by discussions from two online expert workshops with Consortium partners. Furthermore, this set of prerequisites is translated into suggestions for building a dynamic architecture of a Europe-wide scheme in gender equality. This report will be a key input for the co-creation workshops in the subsequent CASPER tasks and activities in WP5. This report is structured as follows: section 2 sets the scene presenting the key issues regarding the architecture of a Europe-wide scheme on gender equality. It is followed by section 3 which provides a brief outline of the fieldwork and a summary of the internal CASPER Consortium workshops where the agenda and process followed is described. Next, in section 4 the fieldwork evidence is brought together with workshop discussions to outline the key prerequisites for a Europe-wide effective award/certification system, distinguishing between ‘must-haves’ and ‘nice-to-haves’ (which will be utilised in the subsequent stages and WPs of the CASPER project). Section 5 suggests a dynamic architecture approach for a Europe-wide scheme based on a reflective synthesis of stakeholders’ recommendations and on the outputs of two internal CASPER workshops, followed by a brief concluding summary.

This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 872113.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Institutional change, Diversity, Awards, RRI, Certifications, Responsible Research and Innovation, Gender equality, SwafS

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 119
    download downloads 29
  • 119
    views
    29
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
2
Average
Average
Average
119
29
Green