Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Stenophylla lobivertex Lombardo 2000

Authors: Schwarz, Christian J.; Ehrmann, Reinhard; Stiewe, Martin B. D.; Mörtter, Rolf; Falkenberg, Michael;

Stenophylla lobivertex Lombardo 2000

Abstract

Stenophylla lobivertex Lombardo, 2000 (Figs. 77–81, 92, 144–145) Stenophylla lobivertex Lombardo, 2000: 34–37. Type locality. Madre de Dios, Peru (Lombardo 2000). Records. CeNak: juv. ♀, 1969, leg. H. W. Koepcke. SMNK: ♂, 230 m, forest station, 22.IX.–10.X.2017, leg. E.-G. Burmeister (SMNK-Mant 12771) (genitalia preparation Schwarz No. 387, Fig. 92). ZSM: ♂, 230 m, 10.X.2017, leg. F. Glaw (Figs. 77–79); ♀, 230 m, 23.VIII.2018, leg. A. Höcherl. CSC: ♀, 230 m, on bush 1.5 m above ground, 10.X.2017, leg. F. Glaw (Figs. 80–81). Distribution. Colombia, Ecuador, Peru. Remarks. The original description of this species did not reflect its true variability, and unfortunately contained a major typographic error, prompting Roy (2005) to describe specimens from French Guiana with an allegedly different morphology as St. gallardi. The latter, known only from a female and a juvenile male, is supposedly distinguished from St. lobivertex by its more regular vertex process, longer tegmina (17 vs. 12 mm), and 9–10 instead of 8 postero-ventral spines. St. lobivertex has become better known since its original description due to additional specimens and some splendid wildlife photographs (e.g. Figs 144–145). We can complete the description of the species by stating that the shape of the vertex process can be both regular and irregular in both females and males from one population, but with more undulated margins than what is known from St. gallardi. In addition, both males and females have 8–9 posteroventral spines on the forefemur, overlapping in this regard with St. gallardi (9–10). The tegmina of our St. lobivertex female are 17.5 mm long, and photos of the type have revealed its tegmina to be in the same range. The erroneous 12 mm published in Lombardo (2000) have thus obscured the overlapping morphology of Guyanan and Western Amazonian specimens. We prefer to retain St. gallardi as a valid species, however, until more specimens of both species are found, including the hitherto unknown males of St. gallardi. The color pattern of the ventral side of the tibiae (Fig. 78) is homologous to the pattern of Callibia (Avendaño & Sarmiento 2011, fig. 1b), thus further supporting the classification scheme of this genus with regard to Acontistini introduced by Schwarz & Roy (2019). Selected life history aspects of St. lobivertex were described by Rönisch & Schwarz (2019).

Published as part of Schwarz, Christian J., Ehrmann, Reinhard, Stiewe, Martin B. D., Mörtter, Rolf & Falkenberg, Michael, 2020, Mantodea of Panguana (Insecta: Dictyoptera), pp. 1-66 in Zootaxa 4824 (1) on page 37, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4824.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4401992

Keywords

Insecta, Arthropoda, Stenophylla lobivertex, Stenophylla, Mantodea, Animalia, Biodiversity, Acanthopidae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
  • 3
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
Green
Related to Research communities