Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Chaperiopsis familiaris Boonzaaier-Davids & Florence & Gibbons 2020, n. comb.

Authors: Boonzaaier-Davids, Melissa K.; Florence, Wayne K.; Gibbons, Mark J.;

Chaperiopsis familiaris Boonzaaier-Davids & Florence & Gibbons 2020, n. comb.

Abstract

Chaperiopsis familiaris (Hayward & Cook, 1983) n. comb. (Fig. 3A, B) Chaperia familiaris Hayward & Cook, 1983: p. 23, figs 3C–E, 7A. Material examined. SAMC-A077585 (dry), FAL 84; SAMC-A077426 (dry), FAL 415; SAMC-A077435 (in ethanol), SAMC-A077440 (in ethanol), FAL 432. Additional comparative material: ‘ Chaperia familiaris ’, SAMCA026415 (holotype), station SM 162 (32°55’S, 28°31’E), off Morgan’s Bay, Southeast Coast, South Africa, heavy dredge, depth 630 m, 25 May 1978. SAMC-A026487, station SM 163 (33°04.6’S, 28°06.6’E), off East London, Southeast Coast, South Africa, heavy dredge, depth 90 m, 26 May 1978. Remarks. Chaperiidae Jullien, 1888 comprises several genera of which the most diverse are Chaperia Jullien, 1888 and Chaperiopsis Uttley, 1949 (www. bryozoa.net, accessed 06 June 2020). The differences between these two genera are the absence of avicularia and ovicells in Chaperia— possessing internal brooding of embryos (Ostrovsky et al. 2009)—while avicularia may be present or absent, and ovicells are present in all species of Chaperiopsis. Chaperia familiaris Hayward & Cook, 1983 forms small encrusting patches on hard substrata including other bryozoans. It has hexagonal-shaped autozooids, rounded distally, with oval opesia, distinct occlusor laminae, no avicularia and two pairs of distolateral spines—typically, the distal pair is cylindrical and the proximal pair is forked. This species also has a distinct hemispherical ooecium that is wider than long, with a transversely oval frontal foramen (membranous area in non-cleaned specimens) (Hayward & Cook 1983) (Fig. 3A, B). The presence of a prominent ooecium suggests that Chaperia familiaris fits better in Chaperiopsis. Previously reported only from the Southeast Coast, the geographical distribution of C. familiaris n. comb. now includes False Bay on the South Coast at 48–630 m depth range.

Published as part of Boonzaaier-Davids, Melissa K., Florence, Wayne K. & Gibbons, Mark J., 2020, Novel taxa of Cheilostomata Bryozoa discovered in the historical backlogs of the Iziko South African Museum, pp. 105-133 in Zootaxa 4820 (1) on page 109, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4820.1.5, http://zenodo.org/record/4397377

Related Organizations
Keywords

Chaperiidae, Chaperiopsis familiaris, Chaperiopsis, Gymnolaemata, Animalia, Biodiversity, Bryozoa, Taxonomy, Cheilostomatida

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
Green
Related to Research communities