Downloads provided by UsageCounts
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>Guilandina bonducella Linnaeus, Species Plantarum, ed. 2, 1: 545. 1762. "Habitat in Indiis." RCN: 3003. Lectotype (Rudd in Dassanayake & Fosberg, Revised Handb. Fl. Ceylon 7: 48. 1991): Herb. Hermann 3: 35, No. 156 (BM-000594677). Current name: Caesalpinia bonduc (L.) Roxb. (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae). Note: Although Brenan (in Milne-Redhead & Polhill, Fl. Trop. E. Africa, Leguminosae 2: 38. 1967) observed that this name was homotypic with G. bonduc L., he did not effectively typify the latter, so the typification of C. bonducella dates from Rudd’s 1991 choice.
Published as part of Jarvis, Charlie, 2007, Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part G), pp. 529-556 in Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types, London :Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum on page 529, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.291971
Tracheophyta, Magnoliopsida, Caesalpinia, Fabales, Fabaceae, Caesalpinia bonduc, Biodiversity, Plantae, Taxonomy
Tracheophyta, Magnoliopsida, Caesalpinia, Fabales, Fabaceae, Caesalpinia bonduc, Biodiversity, Plantae, Taxonomy
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts