Open Research Strategies and Tools in the NIME Community (Workshop NIME 2019, Porto Alegre)

Authors: Jensenius, Alexander Refsum; McPherson, Andrew; Xambó Sedó, Anna; Overholt, Dan; Pellerin, Guillaume; Bukvic, Ivica Ico; Fiebrink, Rebecca; +1 Authors

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4071330 , 10.5281/zenodo.4071329

Open Research Strategies and Tools in the NIME Community (Workshop NIME 2019, Porto Alegre)

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

The development of more openness in research has been in progress for a fairly long time, and has recently received a lot of more political attention through the Plan S initiative, The Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA), EU’s Horizon Europe, and so on. The NIME community has been positive to openness since the beginning, but still has not been able to fully explore this within the community. We call for a workshop to discuss how we can move forward in making the NIME community (even) more open throughout all its activities.

Related Organizations

Queen Mary University of London
United Kingdom
Virginia Tech
United States
University of Oslo
Norway
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Brazil
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Norway

View all View all

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average