Downloads provided by UsageCounts
An English corpus for studying the assessment of argumentation quality. It contains 320 online debate portal arguments, annotated for 15 different quality dimensions by three annotators. In version 2, the annotated XMI files have been changed according to a new underlying type system where each quality dimension is represented by an own annotation. This annotation contains not only the majority score of the respective dimension (as in version 1), but also the mean score and the scores of all annotators. We recommend to use version 2. In case you publish any results related to the Dagstuhl-15512 ArgQuality corpus, please cite our EACL 2017 paper on argumentation quality.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 23 | |
| downloads | 9 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts