Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In this paper the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and the FCE (Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation) are applied to find the best coaches from different sports and to rank these great coaches. First, we screen coaches’ information using three screening criterions. We rank the screened coaches preliminarily by means of analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Second, we rank them by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method(FCE), and we determined the top5 coaches on basketball, football and hockey. Third, we use the Topsis method to test the accuracy and reasonableness of the model, modify the model and then reorder the original results to inspect the consistency of the results of the two models. Finally, we take some other factors into account to optimize our model, which includes on the influence of time line horizon and genders.
Analytic hierarchy process(AHP), Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation(FCE), Topsis method, Best coach.
Analytic hierarchy process(AHP), Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation(FCE), Topsis method, Best coach.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 7 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts