Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The complete assessment, the impact and cost/benefit ratio of the activities of E-RIHS, depends on the knowledge of the overall size of the resources made available by the E-RIHS Members through the appointed national nodes as well as on the value of the resource specifically committed to the activities of E-RIHS. In a broad sense, in-kind contributions represent the capital of European Research Infrastructure Consortia, whose Members, in the proper sense, are the Governments of the involved States. The goal of E-RIHS, the European Research Infrastructure for Heritage Science, is to grow and strengthen a creative, European-wide framework for supporting frontier research in heritage science. It will do so by offering access to expertise, data and technologies through a standardized approach based on different modes of services organized in four platforms: • ARCHLAB (access to heritage archives and collections); • DIGILAB (remote access to data and tools for heritage research); • FIXLAB (access to large-scale facilities and advanced laboratories; • MOLAB (collections of mobile instruments enabling in-situ diagnostics). The scope of D3.4 is represented by the identification of the main foreseeable types of in-kind contributions as well as by the definition of a methodology for the accounting of in-kind resources, taking into-account the specific needs of E-RIHS. According to the working plan defined in the Grant Agreement, at M24 a preliminary report has been delivered. This document represents the starting point of the present document, and it is in line with the following project WPs: Task 2.1 Governance structure of E-RIHS Task 3.1 Finance and budget Task 4.2 Statutes; task 4.3 Internal rules and procedures Task 6.1 Integrating E-RIHS in European funding instruments and joint programming initiatives Task 8.3 Catalogue of E-RIHS resources and services All the activities described in the present document have been also performed on the basis of the following timetable: Definition of the working plan (2nd semester 2017) and its presentation during the project meetings. Submission of a questionnaire to the E-RIHS partner. (1st semester 2018)
ERIC, Evaluation criteria, Distributed Research Instructures, IKCs
ERIC, Evaluation criteria, Distributed Research Instructures, IKCs
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts