Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In English, the adjective-forming suffix -ish can be productively tacked onto relative adjectives (e.g. tall-ish) and total absolute adjectives (e.g. dry-ish), but not to most partial absolute adjectives (e.g. ?bent-ish) or inherently non-scalar adjectives (e.g. ?pregnant-ish). By applying Burnett’s (2017) recent framework DelTCS situated within Delineation Semantics, which she enriched using the notions Tolerant, Classical, Strict, first formulated in Cobreros et al. (2012), I will show why suffixal -ish is felicitous with the first two subtypes of adjectives, but not with the latter two. After a brief comparison with a similar framework from Lasersohn (1999), it will be shown that the scale structure in the DelTCS approach is derived from the adjective’s context-sensitivity and vagueness patterns. Furthermore, the discussion will point to a few instances that do not neatly fit into the mold of current semantic analyses as well as some suggestions on how to obtain a clearer picture of the actual attested data.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts