Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Improving Deliberation, Improving Copyright. Outcomes and Reccomendations.

Authors: Edwards, Lee; Moss, Giles;

Improving Deliberation, Improving Copyright. Outcomes and Reccomendations.

Abstract

This report presents the outcomes of the first two stages of the project Improving Deliberation, Improving Copyright led by Dr Lee Edwards (LSE) and Dr Giles Moss (University of Leeds). The first two stages of the project involved individual dialogues with 34 stakeholders representing a wide range of organisations and institutions in the copyright debate, and ten members of the public, about their experiences of consultations; and stakeholder workshops with 28 dialogue participants working together to answer three broad questions: who should participate in consultations; how they should participate; and why they should participate. In their discussions, participants adopted a systemic perspective of consultations, treating them as an overall system of connected methods, and a stakeholder-centric approach, focusing on needs and perspectives of different stakeholders involved, rather than those of the institution leading the consultation. Participants adopted two purposes (epistemic and democratic) and four principles (inclusive, well-informed, equitable, accountable) for conducting consultations. The report makes four general recommendations to guide decision making when using a stakeholder-centric, systemic approach to designing and implementing consultations: Design consultations as a system using the principles (inclusive, well-informed, equitable, accountable) as benchmarks for assessing the value and effectiveness of each part of the process. Prioritise novel solutions that can address multiple challenges, because these will enhance the overall quality, efficiency and effectiveness of the consultation. Use a mix of solutions that minimise tensions. Where tensions between principles and/or outcomes seem unavoidable as a result of a particular combination of solutions, then context-specific solutions for reducing them should be explored. Explain and justify decisions about the design and implementation of consultations in light of the principles and challenges identified here. When decisions are controversial, deliberation about the principles to apply in relevant situations can help provide an agreed basis for decision-making. The report is accompanied by a toolkit to help with designing and evaluating quality of the consultations, which can be accessed here.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 5
    download downloads 13
  • 5
    views
    13
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
5
13
Green