Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ International Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
International Journal of Recent Innovations in Medicine and Clinical Research
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

A Comparison of Effectiveness of Interactive Methods over Traditional Methods in Teaching Biochemistry to Undergraduate Medical Students

Authors: Namrata Bhutani; Arora, Deepika; Bhutani, Neha;

A Comparison of Effectiveness of Interactive Methods over Traditional Methods in Teaching Biochemistry to Undergraduate Medical Students

Abstract

Background: New MCI curriculum has been introduced from august 2019 which is known as competency based medical education. Interactive teaching methods, which are given emphasis in CBME, can be used in large groups, small groups, pairs and individuals. The main aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of utilization of interactive tools in medical teaching. Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of interactive teaching and learning (ITL) methods over traditional teaching methods in understanding the biochemistry subject and also the perception of students towards them. Methodology: It was a cross-sectional intervention study with crossover design. Pre-designed and pre-validated semi-structured needs assessment and feedback questionnaire were used as study tools. After the needs assessment survey, an ITL module was developed including choosing topics, allocating teachers, interactive T/L methods, time, and assessment questionnaire for each topic. Four different interactive teaching learning methods were compared with traditional teaching learning including, think pair share, buzz session, case based learning and pass the problem. Results: 75% of the students responded as facing difficulty in understanding the content in biochemistry and having the view that traditional methods are not sufficient. 91 % of the students felt that biochemistry should be taught using interactive methods and 56% responded that biochemistry is the most difficult subject in first year. In student performance analysis after introducing ITL sessions (TPS, BS, CBL, and PTP ), it was revealed that 15%, 19%, 20%, and 18% of the students scored >75% in the intervention group compared to only 9%, 5%, 3%, and 2% in the other group where traditional teaching was carried out. This difference was statistically significant for sessions 1, 3 and 4. Conclusions: It was seen that student performance was increased in the interactive sessions. Therefore, it is recommended that there should be more inclusion of interactive teaching methods in undergraduate medical education.

Keywords

Medical education, Interactive teaching methods, CBME

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 22
    download downloads 17
  • 22
    views
    17
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
citations
The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
22
17
Green
gold