Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.7717/peerj.9410 , 10.48550/arxiv.2003.12273 , 10.5281/zenodo.3874959 , 10.5281/zenodo.3713421
pmid: 32714658
pmc: PMC7353915
arXiv: 2003.12273
handle: 1887/3283701
doi: 10.7717/peerj.9410 , 10.48550/arxiv.2003.12273 , 10.5281/zenodo.3874959 , 10.5281/zenodo.3713421
pmid: 32714658
pmc: PMC7353915
arXiv: 2003.12273
handle: 1887/3283701
The implementation of policies promoting the adoption of an open science (OS) culture must be accompanied by indicators that allow monitoring the uptake of such policies and their potential effects on research publishing and sharing practices. This study presents indicators of open access (OA) at the institutional level for universities worldwide. By combining data from Web of Science, Unpaywall and the Leiden Ranking disambiguation of institutions, we track OA coverage of universities’ output for 963 institutions. This paper presents the methodological challenges, conceptual discrepancies and limitations and discusses further steps needed to move forward the discussion on fostering OA and OS practices and policies.
open access, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Scholarly Publishing, 020, Universities, Research policy, QH301-705.5, Science Policy, Scientometrics, R, Computer Science - Digital Libraries, Intellectual Property Law, Open access, Scholarly Communication, Science of science, Medicine, Digital Libraries (cs.DL), Open science, Biology (General), bibliometrics, Library and Information Science, Research assessment, Unpaywall, universities
open access, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Scholarly Publishing, 020, Universities, Research policy, QH301-705.5, Science Policy, Scientometrics, R, Computer Science - Digital Libraries, Intellectual Property Law, Open access, Scholarly Communication, Science of science, Medicine, Digital Libraries (cs.DL), Open science, Biology (General), bibliometrics, Library and Information Science, Research assessment, Unpaywall, universities
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 66 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
| views | 47 | |
| downloads | 38 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts