Downloads provided by UsageCounts
By integrating data on scientific publications from the RISIS publication database with data on European Universities from the European Tertiary Education Register and data on US universities, researchers from USI, Lugano, and from the University of Turin have shown a strong relationship between universities’ revenues and their volume of publications and citations. This relationship implies that international rankings are largely by and large measures of wealth. Further, the study shows that three characteristics differentiate the US system, i.e. a) a significantly higher level of resources, b) a clearer distinction between education-oriented institutions and doctoral universities, and c) a higher concentration of resources among doctoral universities Accordingly, a group of US universities receive a much larger amount of resources and have a far higher number of publications and citations when compared to their European counterparts. These results demonstrate that the ‘transatlantic gap’ in research excellence is largely associated with differences in resources. Implications for public policies and institutional evaluation are discussed.
institutional evaluation, scientific publications, CWTS Publication database, European universities, science studies, university ranking, RISIS ETER dataset, public policies, US universities
institutional evaluation, scientific publications, CWTS Publication database, European universities, science studies, university ranking, RISIS ETER dataset, public policies, US universities
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 21 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts