Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This paper discusses the challenges of using big Earth observation data for land classification. The approach taken is to consider pure data-driven methods to be insufficient to represent continuous change. We argue for sound theories when working with big data. After revising existing classification schemes such as FAO's Land Cover Classification System (LCCS), we conclude that LCCS and similar proposals cannot capture the complexity of landscape dynamics. We then investigate concepts that are being used for analyzing satellite image time series; we show these concepts to be instances of events. Therefore, for continuous monitoring of land change, event recognition needs to replace object identification as the prevailing paradigm. The paper concludes by showing how event semantics can improve data-driven methods to fulfil the potential of big data.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, LUCC, Geographic Information Sciences, FOS: Physical sciences, earth observation, Machine Learning (cs.LG), land-use change, Physics - Geophysics, Computer Science - Computers and Society, Big data, Earth observation, Geospatial semantics, LUCC, Land-use change, big data, Computers and Society (cs.CY), Earth observation, Geography (General), Geography, Computer Sciences, Geophysics (physics.geo-ph), lucc, G1-922, geospatial semantics
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, LUCC, Geographic Information Sciences, FOS: Physical sciences, earth observation, Machine Learning (cs.LG), land-use change, Physics - Geophysics, Computer Science - Computers and Society, Big data, Earth observation, Geospatial semantics, LUCC, Land-use change, big data, Computers and Society (cs.CY), Earth observation, Geography (General), Geography, Computer Sciences, Geophysics (physics.geo-ph), lucc, G1-922, geospatial semantics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 35 | |
| downloads | 23 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts