Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["Martin Potthast, Tim Gollub, Matthias Hagen, Jan Gra\u00dfegger, Johannes Kiesel, Maximilian Michel, Arnd Oberl\u00e4nder, Martin Tippmann, Alberto Barr\u00f3n-Cede\u00f1o, Parth Gupta, Paolo Rosso, and Benno Stein. Overview of the 4th International Competition on Plagiarism Detection. In Pamela Forner, Jussi Karlgren, and Christa Womser-Hacker, editors, Working Notes Papers of the CLEF 2012 Evaluation Labs, September 2012. ISBN 978-88-904810-3-1. ISSN 2038-4963."]}
We provide you with a training corpus that consists of suspicious documents. Each suspicious document is about a specific topic and may consist of plagiarized passages obtained from web pages on that topic found in the ClueWeb09 corpus.
source, retrieval, plagiarism detection
source, retrieval, plagiarism detection
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 43 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts