Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Core data sets analyzed for Studies 1 and 2 in "Testing ritual knot tracing for cognitive priming effects rules out analytic analogy". Note: In keeping with Ryerson University Research Ethics Board protocol #REB 2017-065, data sets are fully anonymized, revealing coded values only and removing all personal information and metadata peripheral to the main study (including reported age, gender, language proficiency, and language usage coding). See main paper and supporting materials for discussion of measures, parameters, conditions, and variables. Corresponding author contact: jpelkey@ryerson.ca
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 7 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts