Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In this work, we conduct experiments comparing OAI-PMH with ResourceSync along a set of dimensions, scenarios and implementation setups. Our results are the first to disclose that OAI-PMH performance varies significantly across platforms, explaining why it is difficult for aggregators to stay synchronised with data providers. We also provide evidence showing that ResourceSync is, if applied in suitable synchronisation mode, substantially faster and more effective in synchronisation of resources and puts also lower load on the data providers than OAI-PMH. By comparing the performance of OAI-PMH with ResourceSync on the task of metadata harvesting (small files), i.e. the most challenging scenario for ResourceSync, we demonstrate that ResourceSync performs up to about 10x faster in the Batch mode than an average OAI-PMH repository.
data synchronisation, global repositories, ResourceSync, interoperability, OAI-PMH
data synchronisation, global repositories, ResourceSync, interoperability, OAI-PMH
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 | |
| downloads | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts