Downloads provided by UsageCounts
A general research data repository is supposed to be intuitively usable for a large variety of users with different backgrounds, needs, and expectations. These come to the fore in the design of the interface as secondary features. While the primary features expressed by the core functionality in the scalability, the retrieval time, or the size of the data to be processed is perceived as an absolute must-have, secondary features are perceived as a real advantage 'nice-to-have'. Yet the one depends crucially on the other. We like to share our experience of configuring a research data repository, designing the technical infrastructure, and adding software functionality. By describing the process of making adjustments and their intended results on the usage behavior, we propose a use case of setting up a general research data repository in which the needs of the user play a central role.
DOI-integration, repository S3-storage, Research data repository design
DOI-integration, repository S3-storage, Research data repository design
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 | |
| downloads | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts