Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Losing Ground 6, Annual Land Cover Products for Massachusetts.

Authors: Valerie J. Pasquarella; Christopher E. Holden;

Losing Ground 6, Annual Land Cover Products for Massachusetts.

Abstract

This dataset consists of a set of annual land cover products for 1985-2017 produced using the CCDC algorithm as part of Mass Audubon's Losing Ground 6 analysis. The sixth edition of Mass Audubon’s Losing Ground series of reports builds on the methods first employed in Losing Ground 5. Following LG5 analysis, the Continuous Change Detection and Classification (CCDC) algorithm, a harmonic modeling approach, was used to identify land cover changes and characterizes the spectral-temporal properties of stable land cover “segments” based on dense time series of all high-quality Landsat observations (Zhu et al. 2012; Zhu and Woodcock 2014). However, the LG6 analysis improves on the training data and land cover labeling system used in LG5. For LG6, we developed a modified version of the MassGIS 2005 Land Use/Land Cover polygons and legend in an effort to provide greater thematic detail as well as increase the ecological relevancy of the mapped results. Integrating the CCDC approach and our detailed land cover training dataset, we produced a 30-year time series of land cover maps for the Massachusetts Mainland and Islands as well as offshore waters. The original maps generated by the CCDC algorithms were then manually post-processed to improve spatial accuracy of change detection results, and final results including post-processing steps are available here. The Losing Ground 6 Classification includes the following land cover classes adapted from the 2005 MassGIS Land Use and 1m Impervious surface datasets: > Man-made Built -- Greater than 25% constructed surfaces such as buildings, roads, parking lots, brick, asphalt, concrete > Man-made Bare -- Areas of man-made compacted soil or material such as mining or unpaved parking lots > Natural Barren -- Natural occurring barren areas (i.e. rocky shores, sand, bare soil) > Forest -- Pixels dominated by closed-canopy forest in leaf-on imagery, as well as mixed-cover pixels spanning forest edges that do not meet criteria for Built. > Forested Wetland -- Persistently vegetated wetlands dominated by tree cover; often found adjacent to rivers and in low-lying areas; Reference MassDEP Wetlands > Plantation -- Planted tree crops, includes orchards and tree farms > Cultural grassland -- Dominated by herbaceous cover, includes pastures, fields, and row crops > Irrigated herbaceous -- Heavily managed grass cover, includes golf courses and (non-synthetic) athletic fields > Successional/transitional forest -- Forest recovering after stand-replacing disturbance; Predominantly (> 25%) shrub cover, and some immature trees not large or dense enough to be classified as forest. It also includes areas that are more permanently shrubby, such as heath areas, wild blueberries or mountain laurel. > Managed shrubland -- Woody vegetation maintained in a mid-successional state, e.g. powerline corridors; includes "self-managed" stable shrublands, e.g. coastal shrub/heathland (e.g. scrub oak) > Open water -- Dominated by open-water conditions, little to no seasonal vegetation cover > Non-forested wetland -- Persistently or seasonally vegetated wetlands with little to no tree cover; Includes freshwater emergent and shrub swamp wetland types; Reference MassDEP Wetlands > Saltwater wetland -- Coastal wetlands, often herbaceous-dominated marsh and may show signs of ditching; Reference MassDEP Wetlands > Active cranberry bog -- active and recently active cranberry bogs; notable red color and geometric patch shapes A more complete description of training sources, class labels and codes, and definitions is available here. Please contact Dr. Valerie Pasquarella (valpasq@bu.edu) with any questions regarding these data and potential use cases.

Related Organizations
Keywords

land cover, Landsat, CCDC, Massachusetts, remote sensing

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 7
  • 7
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
7