Views provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.33878
Dataset from the following publication: Wolf, C. & Schütz, A.C. (2015). Trans-saccadic integration of peripheral and foveal feature information is close to optimal. Journal of Vision, 15(16):1. doi: 10.1167/15.16.1 . Each folder contains the data belonging to the corresponding experiment in the publication. Data sheets are csv files. Each data folder contains a description of the columns. Every row corresponds to one trial. If a value is missing or not applicable for a given trial, it is labelled as NaN ("not a number"). For experiment 1 and 2, the data also include trials which were not considered for final analysis due to too early or too late saccade onsets. Removed trials can be identified by an additional column (see data description). In experiment 2, participant 41 was excluded from the overall analysis, because this participant was not susceptible to the contrast manipulation. For experiment 3, all trials listed in the data sheet were included in the analysis. For further questions, please contact: chr.wolf[at]uni-marburg.de or a.schuetz[at]uni.marburg.de -- Nov 17th 2015 --
trans-saccadic perception, optimal integration, maximum-likelihood estimation, peripheral vision, foveal vision
trans-saccadic perception, optimal integration, maximum-likelihood estimation, peripheral vision, foveal vision
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts