Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The transition to Open Science needs a cultural change across universities, research communities and funders in addition to new tools and infrastructure. Research managers have a high potential for enabling cultural change towards Open Science through their pivotal role within universities. With our poster, we want to shed light on the ways in which research managers can act as advocates for Open Science in order to support cultural change not only among researchers, but also in terms of organizational change and governance. Furthermore, we would like to outline how research managers should be trained accordingly and how they best fulfill their role in complement to experts e.g. from the library or IT-services. The objective should be to join forces and support each other. For our poster, we refer to our experiences in the advocacy of open science practices at the Research and Innovation Services at Leibniz University Hannover (LUH). As appropriate training is a prerequisite for the support of Open Science practices, research managers at LUH together with their colleagues from the library have already attended trainings tailored to their role on the topics of Open Access and research data management. An essential part of the training is the sharing of expert knowledge of each professional group with the other. As current research assessment procedures do not align with Open Science objectives the use of responsible metrics will be added to the training program. There is a need for the further development of trainings and their professionalization as well as for more networking and exchange between librarians and research managers.
{"references": ["Hauck, Reingis. (2017, June). Research Offices As Vital Factors In The Implementation Of Research Data Management Strategies. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2845031", "Meyer, Anneke. (2019, February). Using RISE for Service Evaluation - Experiences, Findings and Differences. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2562798", "Hauck, Reingis. (2019, April). Responsible Metrics \u2013 Verantwortlicher Umgang mit Metriken. Handbuch Qualit\u00e4t in Studium, Lehre und Forschung", "Cox, A.; Gadd, E.; Petersohn, S.; Sbaffi, L. (2017): Competencies for Bibliometrics. In: Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617728111", "Judy Ruttenberg and Elizabeth A. Waraksa. \"Why Does Research Data Management Need Radical Collaboration?\" Research Library Issues, no. 296 (2018): 3\u20135. https://doi.org/10.29242/ rli.296.1."]}
advocacy, open science practices, sustainable services, Research managers, collaboration
advocacy, open science practices, sustainable services, Research managers, collaboration
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts