Views provided by UsageCounts
This data set contains the results of the online survey among 204 germanspeaking bloggers in the Humanities. The survey ran from 13 November to 21 December 2018 and was anonymous. The survey investigated the reasons why scholars in the humanities blog, when and why they consider a blog or blog contribution as successful, how they formally and editorially design their contributions and publication process, and how blogs fit into the scientific discussion and information space. The results confirm that science blogs continue to encompass an extremely wide variety of practices. One trend is the professional and strategically conscious use of blogs, which have found their place as an additional means of communication even among technically less affine researchers. More information and link to data report: https://redaktionsblog.hypotheses.org/4246
https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02150327
Scientifc Blogging
Scientifc Blogging
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 16 |

Views provided by UsageCounts