Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2015
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2015
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Bioinformatics Training For Life Scientists: Guidelines For Best Practice

Authors: Maria-Victoria Schneider; Teresa Attwood; Allegra Via; Catherine Brooksbank;

Bioinformatics Training For Life Scientists: Guidelines For Best Practice

Abstract

This document is aimed at anyone with an interest in training research scientists to become effective users of bioinformatics services. It derives from the shared experiences of a group of people who work independently in bioinformatics training for life scientists; the group met several times during the period 2009 to 2012 to share their experiences, identify common challenges, (Schneider, M. V. et al., 2010), and agree on a set of common working practices that avoid or address these challenges (e.g. Schneider, M. V. et al., 2011). These meetings were supported by the SLING project, which is funded by the European Commission. This document structures that knowledge, with the aim of sharing it with others who have an interest in bioinformatics training. Its goal is to nucleate a ‘community of practice’ among stakeholders in bioinformatics training, enabling this community to exchange working practices that enhance the quality of training provision in this field. This document does not attempt to represent the views of the global bioinformatics training community, but rather tries to consolidate the various experiences of those who have contributed to it. Future developments and advances in bioinformatics training for life sciences will undoubtedly continue to shape these practices, and we look forward to seeing this document, and training best practice in bioinformatics, evolve through the contributions of others.

This document was created as part of Deliverable D2.05 – Trainer networking session 3 and Best working practice document for Roadshow Trainers – of the FP7 project Serving Life-science Information for the Next Generation (Grant agreement number 226073 (Integrating Activity) within Research Infrastructures Action of the FP7 Capacities Specific Programme). It was submitted to the European Commission in February 2012.

Related Organizations
Keywords

FOS: Computer and information sciences, Community of practice, Bioinformatics, Continuing professional development, Training, Best practice, Education

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 12
    download downloads 12
  • 12
    views
    12
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
1
Average
Average
Average
12
12
Green