{"references": ["Guo, B.; Guo, J.J. \"Patterns of technological learning within the\nknowledge systems of industrial clusters in emerging economies:\nEvidence from China\", Technovation, Vol. 31, No. 2-3, 2010 pp. 87-\n104.", "Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K. and Sparks, J. \"The\nInterorganizational Learning Dilemma: Collective Knowledge\nDevelopment in Strategic Alliances\", Organization Science, Vol. 9 No.\n3, 1998, pp. 285-305.", "Knight, L. \"Network learning: exploring learning by interorganizational\nnetworks\", Human Relations, Vol. 55, No.4, 2002, pp. 427-454.", "Porter, M.E. \"Cluster and the new economics of competition\", Harvard\nBusiness Review, Vol. 76, No. 6, 1998, pp. 77- 90.", "Giuliani, E. and Bell, M. \"The micro-determinants of meso-level\nlearning and innovation: evidence from Chilean wine cluster\", Research\nPolicy, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2005, pp. 47-68.", "Baptista, R. and Swann, P. \"Do firms in clusters innovate more?\"\nResearch Policy, Vol. 27, No. 5, 1998, pp. 525-540.", "Schmitz, H. \"Collective efficiency and increasing return\" Cambridge\nJournal of Economics, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1999, pp. 465-483.", "Maskell, P. and Malmberg, A. \"Myopia, knowledge development and\ncluster evolution\", Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 7, No. 5, 2007,\npp. 603\u201318.", "Morrison, A.; Rabellotti, R.; Zirulia, F.L. \"When do global pipelines\nenhance knowledge diffusion in clusters?\" (online) Evolutionary\nEconomic Geography, Utrecht University, 2011\nhttp://econ.geo.uu.nl/peeg/peeg.html\n[10] EURADA Clusters, industrial districts, local productive systems,\nBruxelas, 1999.\n[11] Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. \"Cria\u00e7\u00e3o de valor compartilhado:\ncomoreinventar o capitalismo e desencadearumaonda de inova\u00e7\u00e3o e\ncrescimento\", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 89, No. 1, 2011, pp. 21-\n33.\n[12] Becattini, G., Bellandi, M., Ottati, G. D. and Sforzi, F. From Industrial\nDistricts to Local Development: an intinerary of research, Edward Elgar\nPublishing: Massachusetts, 2003.\n[13] Casarotto, N. F. and Pires, L. H. Redes de pequenas e m\u00e9diasempresas e\ndesenvolvimento local: estrat\u00e9giasparaconquista de competitividade\nglobal com base naexperi\u00eanciaitaliana, Atlas: S\u00e3o Paulo, 2001.\n[14] Britto J. Coopera\u00e7\u00e3ointerindustrial e redes de empresas, In: Kupfer,\nD.;Hasenclever, L. Economia industrial: fundamentoste\u00f3ricos e pr\u00e1ticas\nno Brasil, Campus: Rio de Janeiro, 2002, pp. 345 \u2013 388.\n[15] Beaudry, C and Breschi, S. \"Are firms in clusters really more\ninnovative?\" Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vo. 12,\nNo. 4, 2003, pp. 325-342.\n[16] Staber, U. \"Spatial proximity and firm survival in a declining industrial\ndistrict: the case of knitwear firms in Baden-Wurttemberg\", Regional\nStudies, 2001, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2001, pp. 329 \u2013 341.\n[17] Vilana, J. R. and Monroy, C. R. \"Influence of cultural mechanisms on\nhorizontal inter-firm collaborations\" Journal of Industrial Engineering\nand Management, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2010, pp. 138-175.\n[18] Lundvall, Bengt-Ake. \"The Danish Model and the Globalizing Learning\nEconomy: Lessons for Developing Countries\" (online) World Institute\nfor Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER), 2009,\nhttp://ideas.repec.org/p/unu/wpaper/rp2009-18.html\n[19] Rabellotti, R. \"Is there an 'industrial district model'? Footwear districts\nin Italy and Mexico compared\" World Development, Vol. 23, No. 1,\n1995, pp. 29-41.\n[20] FIESC - Federa\u00e7\u00e3o das Ind\u00fastrias de Santa Catarina \"Santa Catarinaem\nDados\" FIESC: Florian\u00f3polis, 2013.\n[21] ERUCLUSTEX (online) http://www.euroclustexplus.com\n[22] R&I, Ricerche e Inventi do politicaindustriale e del lavoro \"Osservatorio\ndel settoretessileabbliamentoneldistrettodi Carpi\", Comunedi Carpi,\nCarpi (MO), 2011."]}

This paper aims at identifying and analyzing the knowledge transmission channels in textile and clothing clusters located in Brazil and in Europe. Primary data was obtained through interviews with key individuals. The collection of primary data was carried out based on a questionnaire with ten categories of indicators of knowledge transmission. Secondary data was also collected through a literature review and through international organizations sites. Similarities related to the use of the main transmission channels of knowledge are observed in all cases. The main similarities are: influence of suppliers of machinery, equipment and raw materials; imitation of products and best practices; training promoted by technical institutions and businesses; and cluster companies being open to acquire new knowledge. The main differences lie in the relationship between companies, where in Europe the intensity of this relationship is bigger when compared to Brazil. The differences also occur in importance and frequency of the relationship with the government, with the cultural environment, and with the activities of research and development. It is also found factors that reduce the importance of geographical proximity in transmission of knowledge, and in generating trust and the establishment of collaborative behavior.