Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This database was created as preparatory work for the Scientific Opinion on the assessment of dairy cow welfare in small-scale farming systems (EFSA, 2015) to collect data for the description and the categorisation of European Small-Scale Dairy Farms (SSDF) based on size, farming system and husbandry practices and (ii) to analyse the feasibility in SSDF of animal-based measures usually used for intensive farming. The Scientific Opinion was necessary to address specific expectations of consumers on locally produced food and acceptable animal welfare conditions in the context of the EU Strategy for the protection and welfare of animals 2012-2015. The on-farm survey was run to collect data for welfare assessment covering Austria, France, Italy and Spain. A total of 124 farms with up to 75 cows were selected based on three criteria reflecting use of local resources or enrolment in a certification scheme: (1) the type of enterprise (ownership and workers), (2) the use of inputs in the production process, including the use of local feed and local breeds, and (3) the production type (certification schemes). From 124 dairy farms visited 119 were considered as SSDF. Among the 119 farms included in the survey as non-conventional, some of them had a very small herd size (44 had less than 25 cows and one had only 10 cows) and some of them had more animals (19 farms had between 51 and 75 dairy cows). The database includes 53 continuous and categorical farm descriptor variables, 23 continuous and categorical risk-factor variables and 47 animal-based measures in small-scale farms. The final data model used was based on data collection at farm/herd level, pen level and animal level.
{"references": ["European Commission Question No EFSA-Q-2014-00096, adopted on 6 May 2015", "Council Directive 98/58/EC of 20 July 1998 concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes . Official Journal L 221 , 08/08/1998 P. 0023 - 0027", "EFSA AHAW Panel (EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Animal Welfare), 2015. Scientific Opinion on the assessment of dairy cow welfare in small-scale farming systems. EFSA Journal 2015;13(6):4137, 102 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4137", "Leeb C, Mirabito L, Canali E, Blanco-Penedo I, Ghione J, Tremetsberger L, Barbieri S, Dai F, Kottik D, Tremolada C,Varvar\u00f3-Porter A, Xercavins-Sim\u00f3 A, Proudom Y, Rehben E, F\u00e0brega E, Macchiorlatti Vignat I, Zuliani A, Battaglia D, Fern\u00e1ndez C, Ponzio R, Della Torre E and Mounier L, 2015. Preparatory work for the scientific opinion on welfare assessment of dairy cows in small scale farming systems. EFSA supporting publication 2015:EN-852, 109 pp."]}
EU; XML; data.collection@efsa.europa.eu
http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C1976, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C2208, non-conventional, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C1179, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C1991, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C2167, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C731, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C5079, risk factors, animal-based measures, climate, dairy production, local breeds, small-scale farming, sustainability, herds, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C1367, pasture, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C6157, consumer attitudes, welfare assessment, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C12508, production diseases, environment
http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C1976, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C2208, non-conventional, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C1179, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C1991, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C2167, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C731, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C5079, risk factors, animal-based measures, climate, dairy production, local breeds, small-scale farming, sustainability, herds, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C1367, pasture, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C6157, consumer attitudes, welfare assessment, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C12508, production diseases, environment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 20 | |
| downloads | 87 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts