Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.2812602 , 10.5281/zenodo.2672104 , 10.5281/zenodo.2814087 , 10.5281/zenodo.2661774 , 10.5281/zenodo.2824298 , 10.5281/zenodo.2666393 , 10.5281/zenodo.2837652 , 10.5281/zenodo.2662830 , 10.5281/zenodo.2840191 , 10.5281/zenodo.2663445 , 10.5281/zenodo.2837651 , 10.5281/zenodo.2664404 , 10.5281/zenodo.2824297 , 10.5281/zenodo.2662450 , 10.5281/zenodo.2662829 , 10.5281/zenodo.1092943 , 10.5281/zenodo.2825226 , 10.5281/zenodo.2662449 , 10.5281/zenodo.2814088 , 10.5281/zenodo.2812603 , 10.5281/zenodo.2828069 , 10.5281/zenodo.2862378 , 10.5281/zenodo.2830745 , 10.5281/zenodo.2665367 , 10.5281/zenodo.1092944 , 10.5281/zenodo.2663444 , 10.5281/zenodo.2666392 , 10.5281/zenodo.2825225 , 10.5281/zenodo.2672105 , 10.5281/zenodo.2661775 , 10.5281/zenodo.2840190 , 10.5281/zenodo.2664403 , 10.5281/zenodo.2830746 , 10.5281/zenodo.2862379 , 10.5281/zenodo.2665366 , 10.5281/zenodo.2828070
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.2812602 , 10.5281/zenodo.2672104 , 10.5281/zenodo.2814087 , 10.5281/zenodo.2661774 , 10.5281/zenodo.2824298 , 10.5281/zenodo.2666393 , 10.5281/zenodo.2837652 , 10.5281/zenodo.2662830 , 10.5281/zenodo.2840191 , 10.5281/zenodo.2663445 , 10.5281/zenodo.2837651 , 10.5281/zenodo.2664404 , 10.5281/zenodo.2824297 , 10.5281/zenodo.2662450 , 10.5281/zenodo.2662829 , 10.5281/zenodo.1092943 , 10.5281/zenodo.2825226 , 10.5281/zenodo.2662449 , 10.5281/zenodo.2814088 , 10.5281/zenodo.2812603 , 10.5281/zenodo.2828069 , 10.5281/zenodo.2862378 , 10.5281/zenodo.2830745 , 10.5281/zenodo.2665367 , 10.5281/zenodo.1092944 , 10.5281/zenodo.2663444 , 10.5281/zenodo.2666392 , 10.5281/zenodo.2825225 , 10.5281/zenodo.2672105 , 10.5281/zenodo.2661775 , 10.5281/zenodo.2840190 , 10.5281/zenodo.2664403 , 10.5281/zenodo.2830746 , 10.5281/zenodo.2862379 , 10.5281/zenodo.2665366 , 10.5281/zenodo.2828070
{"references": ["W.W. Chin,PLS-Graph User's Guide, Version 3.0. C.T. Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, Houston, TX, (ed). W. W. Chin, 2001.", "A. Diamantopoulos,J.A.Siguaw, Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration, British Journal of Management, 17(4), 2006, pp. 263-282.", "A. Diamantopoulos, J. A. Siguaw, Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development, Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 2001, pp. 269-277.", "B.A. Wernerfelt, Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic", "B. Becker, G. Barry, The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1996,pp. 779\u2013801.", "C.K. Prahalad, G. Hamel, T.D. Pisano, G., A. Shuen, A. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 1997, pp. 509-533.", "C.K. Prahalad, G. Hamel, The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 1990, pp. 79-91.", "D.J.Collis. C.A. Montgomery, Competing on resources: Strategy in the 1990s.Harvard Business Review, July-August, 1995, pp. 118-28.", "G. Becker, Capital Humano en la Nueva Sociedad. Presentaci\u00f3n, Fundaci\u00f3n DMR, http://www.fundaciondmr. 2003. \n[10]\tG. Becker, Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education (3rd ed.),1993.\n[11]\tG.S. Day, Capabilities for forging customer relationships. Marketing Science Institute, Working paper no. 100\u2013118, 2000, Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.\n[12]\tG.S.Day, The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58, 1994, pp. 37-52.\n[13]\tJ. B. Barney, Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 9(4), 1995, pp.49\u201361.\n[14]\tJ.M. Viedma, In Search of an Intellectual capital General Theory. Electronic Journal on Knowledge Management, 1(2), 2003, pp. 213-226. \n[15]\tJ.B. Barney,D.J. Ketchen, M. Wright, The future of Resource-based Theory: Revitalization or decline?Journal of Management, 37(5), 2011, pp. 1299-1315.\n[16]\tJ.B. Barney, Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1), 1991, pp. 99-120.\n[17]\tJ.B. Barney, Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy, Management Science, 42, 1986, pp. 1231-1241.\n[18]\tM.A. Hitt, L.Bierman, K. Shimizu, R.Kochar,Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: a Resource-Based Perspective,Academy management Journal Direct(in press).\n[19]\tM.R. Allen, The relationship between human resource practices and firm performance: Examining causal order. Personnel Psychology, 58, 2005, pp. 409-446.\n[20]\tN. Bontis, J. Fitzenz, Intellectual capital ROI: A current map to human capital antecedents and consequences. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(3),2002, pp. 223-247.\n[21]\tP.S. Sayedeh, S.Sofian, S. P.Saeidi, Moderating Effect of Environmental Management Accounting on Innovation and Firm Performance: Review of Contemporary Literature,J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 3(11), 2013, pp. 332-338\n[22]\tR.Amit, P. J. H. Schoemaker, Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 1993, pp. 33-46.\n[23]\tR.Shrader, S. Siegal, Assessing the relationship between human capital and firm performance: Evidence from technology-based new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2007, pp. 893-908.\n[24]\tR.B. Grant, A resource based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation, California Management Review, 33(3), 1991, pp. 114-135.\n[25]\tR.B. Grant, Prospering in Dynamically-competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration, Organization Science, 7(4), 1996, pp. 375-387\n[26]\tS.G. Bharadwaj, P.R. Varadarajan, J. Fahy, Sustainable competitive advantage in service industries: a conceptual model and research propositions, Journal of Marketing, 57(October), 1995, pp. 83-99.\n[27]\tT. Bates, Entrepreneur human capital inputs and small business longevity. The Review of Economics and Statistics,72(4), 1990, pp. 551-559.\n[28]\tT.N.Garavan, M Morley, P. Gunnigle, E. Collins,Human Capital accumulation: The role of human resource development. Journal of European Industrial Training, 25,2001,pp. 48-68.\n[29]\tW.W. Chin, The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research. Lawrence Erlbaum associates, Mahwah, NJ (USA), 1993.\n[30]\tX. Mamaqi, A. Gonz\u00e1lez, L.M. Albisu, The relationship between competitive advantage and firms results in the Aragon food industry. Econom\u00edaAgraria y RecursosNaturales, 9(2), 2009, pp. 79-104.\n[31]\tT. W. Schultz, La Inversi\u00f3n en Capital Humano. Educaci\u00f3n y Sociedad, 8, (3), 1983, pp. 34-78."]}
Organization capacity learning is a process referring to the sum total of individual and collective learning through training programs, experience and experimentation, among others. Today, in-business ongoing training is one of the most important strategies for human capital development and it is crucial to sustain and improve workers’ knowledge and skills. Many organizations, firms and business are adopting a strategy of continuous learning, encouraging employees to learn new skills continually to be innovative and to try new processes and work in order to achieve a competitive advantage and superior business results. This paper uses the Resource Based View and Capacities (RBV) approach to construct a hypothetical relationships model between training and business results. The test of the model is applied on transversal data. A sample of 266 business of Spanish sector service has been selected. A Structural Equation Model (SEM) is used to estimate the relationship between ongoing training, represented by two latent dimension denominated Human and Social Capital resources and economic business results. The coefficients estimated have shown the efficient of some training aspectsexplaining the variation in business results.
training, Human and Social Capital resources, SEM., Business results, RBV Theory
training, Human and Social Capital resources, SEM., Business results, RBV Theory
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 10 | |
| downloads | 12 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts