Views provided by UsageCounts
Background: Renal stones for patients with a single functioning kidney are considered a great challenge for urologists. Different treatment modalities are used for those with a single functioning kidney, including shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intra-renal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety outcomes of PCNL in patients with a single kidney compared to those with bilateral kidneys. Methods: A prospective comparative study conducted in Urology department of Safeer Al-Imam Al-Hussein hospital in Karbala city-Iraq through the period from 1 st of March, 2015 to 30 th of September, 2018 on sample of 173 patients with renal stones surgically operated with PCNL categorized into two groups; group I included 51 patients with a single functioning kidney and group II included 122 patients with bilateral functioning kidneys. Results: The mean age of group I patients was 42.76 years which was significantly higher than mean age of group II patients of 36.54 years (p=0.01). No significant differences were observed between group I and group II patients regarding gender, pre and intraoperative characteristics. Postoperative stone clearance, bleeding, renal function, organ injury and sepsis were not significantly different between two. Conclusions: PCNL is effective and safe surgical procedure for treatment of renal stones of patients with a single functioning kidney.
Renal stone; Single functioning kidney; Bilateral functioning kidneys; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Karbala
Renal stone; Single functioning kidney; Bilateral functioning kidneys; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Karbala
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts