Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This dataset, which was created by merging data from CrossRef, CORE, and Mendeley, contains metadata for over 800 thousand publications published between 2013 and 2018. The dataset was used to study how much time does it take for authors to deposit their articles in Open Access repositories in relation to when these articles were published. The source codes of our analysis are available at https://github.com/oacore/jcdl_2019.
Research Excellence Framework, Open Access, https://dl.acm.org/ccs/ccs.cfm?lid=0.10002951.10003227.10003351, https://dl.acm.org/ccs/ccs.cfm?lid=0.10002951.10003227.10003392, Research Evaluation, https://dl.acm.org/ccs/ccs.cfm?lid=10010405.10010476.10010477, REF, Scholarly Communication
Research Excellence Framework, Open Access, https://dl.acm.org/ccs/ccs.cfm?lid=0.10002951.10003227.10003351, https://dl.acm.org/ccs/ccs.cfm?lid=0.10002951.10003227.10003392, Research Evaluation, https://dl.acm.org/ccs/ccs.cfm?lid=10010405.10010476.10010477, REF, Scholarly Communication
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 51 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts